A Movement That Never Materialized: The Perception of Scientific Materialism as a Secular Movement in Nineteenth-Century Germany

2020 ◽  
pp. 273-296
1979 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Arthur P. Molella ◽  
Frederick Gregory

Author(s):  
Frederick C. Beiser

This chapter examines the so-called “materialism controversy,” one of the most important intellectual disputes of the second half of the nineteenth century. The dispute began in the 1850s, and its shock waves reverberated until the end of the century. The main question posed by the materialism controversy was whether modern natural science, whose authority and prestige were now beyond question, necessarily leads to materialism. Materialism was generally understood to be the doctrine that only matter exists and that everything in nature obeys only mechanical laws. If such a doctrine were true, it seemed there could be no God, no free will, no soul, and hence no immortality. These beliefs, however, seemed vital to morality and religion. So the controversy posed a drastic dilemma: either a scientific materialism or a moral and religious “leap of faith.” It was the latest version of the old conflict between reason and faith, where now the role of reason was played by natural science.


2019 ◽  
pp. 111-129
Author(s):  
John Hedley Brooke

Chemistry has been distinctive in its relations with religious and anti-religious belief. In its alchemical formation it minimally provided analogies for spiritual transformation. By the late-nineteenth century it was a prominent resource for scientific materialism and reductionism. Currently, it underpins ambitious projects for biosynthesis, usurping a vocabulary of ‘creation’. The aim of this chapter is to identify turning points as chemistry became a fully naturalized science. Five theses are introduced: that a simple antithesis between natural science and supernatural religion is inadequate; that chemistry, for much of its history, could be on the side of the angels; that, conversely and in other contexts, it could be corrosive of religious belief; that, as a catalyst for both belief and unbelief, it could be ambiguous in its cultural implications; and that the importance of scientific naturalism as an agent of disbelief is easily exaggerated.


PMLA ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 774-782
Author(s):  
Marvin Carlson

During the nineteenth century the phenomenon of heredity was of great interest to artists as well as biologists, but its actual dynamics remained mysterious to both. Some felt that the inheritance of characteristics was to be explained on physiological grounds, some on psychic, and some on a combination of the two. A writer inclined toward scientific materialism like Zola naturally emphasized the physical interpretation of this phenomenon, but Ibsen and Strindberg found the possibility of heredity through psychic means, called telegony by August Weismann, more useful for their aesthetic concerns. Their plays show many varieties of this phenomenon, using telegony in ways related both to contemporary scientific speculation and to a long literary tradition, in which a key work was Goethe's Die Wahlverwandtschaften.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document