Emanuel Pfoh, Syria-Palestine in the Late Bronze Age. An Anthropology of Politics and Power. London/New York, Routledge 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 307 (3) ◽  
pp. 775-776
Author(s):  
Matteo Vigo

Eastern Mediterranean - Paul Halstead (ed.). Neolithic society in Greece (Sheffield Studies in Aegean Archaeology 2). 163 pages, 50 figures, 4 tables. 1999. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press; 1-85075-824-7 paperback £14.95 & US$19.95. - Angelos Chaniotis (ed.). From Minoan farmers to Roman traders: sidelights on the economy of ancient Crete (Heidelberger Althistorische Beiträge und Epigraphische Studien 29). x+ 394 pages, 27 figures, 19 tables. 1999. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner; 3-515-07621-2 paperback DM/SF148, Sch1080. - Vassos Karageorghis with Joan R. Mertens & Marice E. Rose. Ancient art from Cyprus: the Cesnola Collection in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. xiv+ 305 pages, colour & b&w photographs, 2 maps. New York (NY): Metropolitan Museum of Art; 0-87099-945-1 & 0-87099-944-3 hardback & paperback $55 & $40 or from Harry N. Abrams 0-8109-6552-6 hardback $60. - Vassos Karageorghis & Terence P. Brennan. Ayia Paraskevi figurines in the University of Pennsylvania Museum. iii+ 44 pages, 24 figures. 1999. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Museum; 0-924171-75-8 paperback $8.95. - John A. Koumilides (ed.). Cyprus: the legacy - historic landmarks that influenced the art of Cyprus, Late Bronze Age to A.D. 1600. 118 pages, figures. 1999. Bethesda (MD): University Press of Maryland; 1-883-05351-X hardback $30. - Cyprus Department of Antiquities. Report of the Department of Antiquities, Cyprus, 1999. x+ 350 pages, figures, tables. 1999. n.p.: Republic of Cyprus Ministry of Communications & Works Department of Antiquities. - Roy MacLeod (ed.). The library of Alexandria: centre of learning in the ancient world. xii+ 196 pages, 1 figure. 2000. London: I.B. Tauris; 1-86064-428-7 hardback £39.50.

Antiquity ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (285) ◽  
pp. 713-714
Author(s):  
N. James

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-116
Author(s):  
Matthew Clark

In this article, the origins of the cult of the ritual drink known as soma/haoma are explored. Various shortcomings of the main botanical candidates that have so far been proposed for this so-called “nectar of immortality” are assessed. Attention is brought to a variety of plants identified as soma/haoma in ancient Asian literature. Some of these plants are included in complex formulas and are sources of dimethyl tryptamine, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and other psychedelic substances. It is suggested that through trial and error the same kinds of formulas that are used to make ayahuasca in South America were developed in antiquity in Central Asia and that the knowledge of the psychoactive properties of certain plants spreads through migrants from Central Asia to Persia and India. This article summarizes the main arguments for the botanical identity of soma/haoma, which is presented in my book, The Tawny One: Soma, Haoma and Ayahuasca (Muswell Hill Press, London/New York). However, in this article, all the topics dealt with in that publication, such as the possible ingredients of the potion used in Greek mystery rites, an extensive discussion of cannabis, or criteria that we might use to demarcate non-ordinary states of consciousness, have not been elaborated.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Masalha

The Concept of Palestine is deeply rooted in the collective consciousness of the indigenous people of Palestine and the multicultural ancient past. The name Palestine is the most commonly used from the Late Bronze Age (from 1300 BCE) onwards. The name Palestine is evident in countless histories, inscriptions, maps and coins from antiquity, medieval and modern Palestine. From the Late Bronze Age onwards the names used for the region, such as Djahi, Retenu and Cana'an, all gave way to the name Palestine. Throughout Classical Antiquity the name Palestine remained the most common and during the Roman, Byzantine and Islamic periods the concept and political geography of Palestine acquired official administrative status. This article sets out to explain the historical origins of the concept of Palestine and the evolving political geography of the country. It will seek to demonstrate how the name ‘Palestine’ (rather than the term ‘Cana'an’) was most commonly and formally used in ancient history. It argues that the legend of the ‘Israelites’ conquest of Cana'an’ and other master narratives of the Bible evolved across many centuries; they are myth-narratives, not evidence-based accurate history. It further argues that academic and school history curricula should be based on historical facts/empirical evidence/archaeological discoveries – not on master narratives or Old Testament sacred-history and religio-ideological constructs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document