2. Gang Involvement

2019 ◽  
pp. 37-62
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C. Cappadocia ◽  
Joanne G. Cummings ◽  
Debra Pepler ◽  
Wendy Craig ◽  
Jennifer Connolly
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Choe ◽  
Jason J. Washburn ◽  
Karen M. Abram ◽  
Linda A. Teplin

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah Jaggers ◽  
Wesley T. Church ◽  
Sara Tomek ◽  
Kathleen A. Bolland ◽  
Lisa M. Hooper ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah Jaggers ◽  
Wesley T. Church ◽  
Sara Tomek ◽  
Kathleen A. Bolland ◽  
Lisa M. Hooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Heidi Ellis ◽  
Saida M. Abdi ◽  
Vanja Lazarevic ◽  
Matthew T. White ◽  
Alisa K. Lincoln ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 105756772094857
Author(s):  
Nicole J. Johnson ◽  
Alyssa Mendlein

Vigil’s multiple marginality (MM) model of gang formation has resulted in hypotheses about why minority youth join gangs, and how these processes play out at multiple levels of analysis and across contexts. However, with a few exceptions, this framework has rarely been tested quantitatively, and especially in countries outside of North America. The current study assesses the MM model using data from the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study and aggregate country-level data. Results from multilevel analyses reveal some support for the framework, in that at least one measure of each component of the MM model was found to be a significant predictor of gang membership. Controlling for individual and country variables, measures of street socialization exhibited the strongest effects on gang involvement. Yet not all proposed factors were significant predictors across all models. Longitudinal data are necessary to fully support the dynamics of the MM model.


Youth Justice ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 93-112
Author(s):  
Sarah Frisby-Osman ◽  
Jane L. Wood

Mental health difficulties, conduct problems, and emotional maladjustment predict a range of negative outcomes, and this may include gang involvement. However, few studies have examined how behavioral, mental health, socio-cognitive, and emotional factors all relate to adolescent gang involvement. This study examined 91 adolescents to compare non-gang with gang-involved youth on their conduct problems, emotional distress, guilt-proneness, anxiety and depression, and use of moral disengagement and rumination. Analyses revealed that gang-involved youth had higher levels of anxiety, depression, moral disengagement, and rumination. Gang-involved youth also had higher levels of conduct disorder and exposure to violence, but they did not differ from non-gang youth on levels of emotional distress and guilt-proneness. Discriminant function analysis further showed that conduct problems, moral disengagement, and rumination were the most important predictors of gang involvement. Discussion focuses on how intervention and prevention efforts to tackle gang involvement need to consider the mental health and behavioral needs of gang-involved youth. Further research is also needed to build an evidence base that identifies the cause/effect relationship between mental health and gang involvement to inform the best practice when tackling gang membership.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document