scholarly journals Multipoint Identity-by-Descent Prediction Using Dense Markers to Map Quantitative Trait Loci and Estimate Effective Population Size

Genetics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 176 (4) ◽  
pp. 2551-2560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo H. E. Meuwissen ◽  
Mike E. Goddard
2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (7) ◽  
pp. 1923-1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Tamisier ◽  
Elsa Rousseau ◽  
Sebastien Barraillé ◽  
Ghislaine Nemouchi ◽  
Marion Szadkowski ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
MIGUEL PÉREZ-ENCISO ◽  
ODILE ROUSSOT

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) are a widely used marker system: the technique is very cost-effective, easy and rapid, and reproducibly generates hundreds of markers. Unfortunately, AFLP alleles are typically scored as the presence or absence of a band and, thus, heterozygous and dominant homozygous genotypes cannot be distinguished. This results in a significant loss of information, especially as regards mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs). We present a Monte Carlo Markov Chain method that allows us to compute the identity by descent probabilities (IBD) in a general pedigree whose individuals have been typed for dominant markers. The method allows us to include the information provided by the fluorescent band intensities of the markers, the rationale being that homozygous individuals have on average higher band intensities than heterozygous individuals, as well as information from linked markers in each individual and its relatives. Once IBD probabilities are obtained, they can be combined into the QTL mapping strategy of choice. We illustrate the method with two simulated populations: an outbred population consisting of full sib families, and an F2 cross between inbred lines. Two marker spacings were considered, 5 or 20 cM, in the outbred population. There was almost no difference, for the practical purpose of QTL estimation, between AFLPs and biallelic codominant markers when the band density is taken into account, especially at the 5 cM spacing. The performance of AFLPs every 5 cM was also comparable to that of highly polymorphic markers (microsatellites) spaced every 20 cM. In economic terms, QTL mapping with a dense map of AFLPs is clearly better than microsatellite QTL mapping and little is lost in terms of accuracy of position. Nevertheless, at low marker densities, AFLPs or other biallelic markers result in very inaccurate estimates of QTL position.


2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. HOSPITAL ◽  
I. GOLDRINGER ◽  
S. OPENSHAW

We studied the efficiency of recurrent selection based solely on marker genotypes (marker-based selection), in order to increase favourable allele frequency at 50 previously detected quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Two selection procedures were investigated, using computer simulations: (1) Truncation Selection (MTS), in which individuals are ranked based on marker score, and best individuals are selected for recombination; and (2) QTL Complementation Selection (QCS), in which individuals are selected such that their QTL composition complements those individuals already selected. Provided QTL locations are accurate, marker-based selection with a population size of 200 was very effective in rapidly increasing frequencies of favourable QTL alleles. QCS methods were more effective than MTS for improving the mean frequency and fixation of favourable QTL alleles. Marker-based selection was not very sensitive to a reduction in population size, and appears valuable to optimize the use of molecular markers in recurrent selection programmes.


Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 421-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
T H E Meuwissen ◽  
M E Goddard

Abstract A multimarker linkage disequilibrium mapping method was developed for the fine mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) using a dense marker map. The method compares the expected covariances between haplotype effects given a postulated QTL position to the covariances that are found in the data. The expected covariances between the haplotype effects are proportional to the probability that the QTL position is identical by descent (IBD) given the marker haplotype information, which is calculated using the genedropping method. Simulation results showed that a QTL was correctly positioned within a region of 3, 1.5, or 0.75 cM in 70, 62, and 68%, respectively, of the replicates using markers spaced at intervals of 1, 0.5, and 0.25 cM, respectively. These results were rather insensitive to the number of generations since the QTL occurred and to the effective population size, except that 10 generations yielded rather poor estimates of the QTL position. The position estimates of this multimarker disequilibrium mapping method were more accurate than those from a single marker transmission disequilibrium test. A general approach for identifying QTL is suggested, where several stages of disequilibrium mapping are used with increasingly dense marker spacing.


Genetics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 172 (3) ◽  
pp. 1955-1965 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Grapes ◽  
M. Z. Firat ◽  
J. C. M. Dekkers ◽  
M. F. Rothschild ◽  
R. L. Fernando

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document