Actual Error Rates in Classification of the T-Distributed Random Field Observation Based on Plug-in Linear Discriminant Function

Informatica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kęstutis Dučinskas ◽  
Eglė Zikarienė
1979 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Dillon

This article is a review of the results, as are available, on the performance of the linear discriminant function in situations where the assumptions of multivariate normality and equal group dispersion structures are violated. Some new results are discussed for the case of classification using discrete variables, and in the case of both binary and continuous variables. In addition, alternative methods which have been proposed, and evaluated, for estimating misclassification error rates are thoroughly reviewed. In all cases, the material is reviewed in terms of practical significance, with particular emphasis on the conditions unfavorable to the performance of each procedure.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
I. Egbo ◽  
M. Egbo ◽  
S. I. Onyeagu

<p>This paper focuses on the robust classification procedures in two group discriminant analysis with multivariate binary variables. A normal distribution based data set is generated using the R-software statistical analysis system 2.15.3 using Barlett’s approximation to chi-square, the data set was found to be homogenous and was subjected to five linear classifiers namely: maximum likelihood discriminant function, fisher’s linear discriminant function, likelihood ratio function, full multinomial function and nearest neighbour function rule. To judge the performance of these procedures, the apparent error rates for each procedure are obtained for different sample sizes. The results obtained ranked the procedures as follows: fisher’s linear discriminant function, maximum likelihood, full multinomial, likelihood function and nearest neigbour function.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document