Correlation between Faecal Tumour M2 Pyruvate Kinase and Colonoscopy for the Detection of Adenomatous Neoplasia in a Secondary Care Cohort

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley D. Bond ◽  
Michael D. Burkitt ◽  
David Sawbridge ◽  
Bernard M. Corfe ◽  
Chris S. Probert

Background & Aims: Colorectal cancer screening programmes that target detection and excision of adenomatous colonic polyps have been shown to reduce colorectal cancer related mortality. Many screening programmes include an initial faecal occult blood test (FOBt) prior to colonoscopy. To refine the selection of patients for colonoscopy other faecal-based diagnostic tools have been proposed, including tumour M2-pyruvate kinase (tM2-PK). To determine whether tM2-PK quantification may have a role in diverse settings we have assessed the assay in a cohort of patients derived from both the England bowel cancer screening programme (BCSP) and symptomatic individuals presenting to secondary care. Method. Patients undergoing colonoscopy provided faecal samples prior to bowel preparation. Faecal tM2-PK concentrations were measured by ELISA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and ROC analyses were calculated. Results. Ninety-six patients returned faecal samples: 50 of these with adenomas and 7 with cancer. Median age was 68. Median faecal tM2-PK concentration was 3.8 U/mL for individuals without neoplastic findings at colonoscopy, 7.7 U/mL in those with adenomas and 24.4 U/mL in subjects with colorectal cancer (both, p=0.01). ROC analysis demonstrated an AUROC of 0.66 (sensitivity 72.4%, specificity 48.7%, positive predictive value 67.7%, negative predictive value 36.7%). Amongst BCSP patients with a prior positive FOBt faecal tM2-PK was more abundant (median 6.4 U/mL, p=0.03) and its diagnostic accuracy was greater (AUROC 0.82). Conclusion. Our findings confirm that faecal tM2-PK ELISA may have utility as an adjunct to FOBt in a screening context, but do not support its use in symptomatic patients. Abbreviations: BCSP: Bowel cancer screening programme; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; FAP: Familial adenomatous polyposis; FOBt: Faecal occult blood testing; NHS: National Health Service; tM2-PK: tumour M2-pyruvate kinase.

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masato Itoh ◽  
Ken Takahashi ◽  
Hiroshi Nishida ◽  
Kiyonobu Sakagami ◽  
Toshiteru Okubo

Objective –To estimate the optimal cut off point in a new immunological method (OC-Hemodia®) for faecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Setting –A corporate colorectal cancer screening programme in Japan. Method –The screening programme targeted colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps ≥ 10 mm, and was conducted on 27 860 participants (age ⩾ 40) during 1991–92. The follow up consisted of diagnostic management by total colonoscopy on positive screened subjects exceeding the manufacturer recommended cut off level of 50 ng/ml faecal haemoglobin, and the identification of false negative cases by health insurance claims. The optimal cut off point was estimated by the positive predictive value, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and a cost effectiveness analysis. In this study evaluation was carried out only for cancer as the target disease. Results –At the current cut off level of 50 ng/ml the sensitivity and specificity were 86.5% and 94.9%. When the optimal cut off point was estimated the highest positive predictive value was obtained at 250–350 ng/ml. The ROC curve showed that the sum of sensitivity and specificity is maximised at 50 ng/ml, but evaluation of the ratio, change in sensitivity/change in false positive rate, pointed to higher optimal cut off points, showing marked changes occurring at about 200 ng/ml. The average cost per case was lowest at 250–300 ng/ml. Overall, the optimal cut off point was estimated to be about 200 ng/ml, at which the sensitivity and specificity of the test would be 77.5% and 98.9%, respectively. Conclusion –The optimal cut off point of the new immunological method of FOBT was estimated to be about 200 ng/ml, a value which, more than the current cut off value, favours specificity over sensitivity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 2S87-2S97
Author(s):  
Bohumil Seifert ◽  
Ondřej Májek ◽  
Miroslav Zavoral ◽  
Norbert Král ◽  
Štěpán Suchánek ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Rodríguez Martín ◽  
DJ Matias ◽  
L Monteserín Ron ◽  
S Vivas Alegre ◽  
R Díez Rodríguez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document