occult blood test
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

741
(FIVE YEARS 79)

H-INDEX

42
(FIVE YEARS 3)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258129
Author(s):  
Sharifah Saffinas Syed Soffian ◽  
Nazarudin Safian ◽  
Azmawati Mohammed Nawi ◽  
Shahrul Bariyah Ahmad ◽  
Huan-Keat Chan ◽  
...  

The uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) in many countries with an opportunistic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme remains suboptimal. This study aimed to determine the rate, associated factors and reasons of refusal to perform the iFOBT test offered under an opportunistic CRC screening programme in semi-urban communities. This cross-sectional study was conducted among the average-risk individuals living in semi-urban areas, who sought care from public primary care centres across Kedah state, Malaysia. The information regarding the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of individuals who were offered the iFOBT between January and April 2019, along with their willingness to perform the test, was gathered. The factors associated with the refusal were further explored using the logistic regression analysis. The individuals offered the iFOBT (n = 920) were mainly female (52.4%) and had a mean age of 58.7±10.6 years. The refusal rate of the iFOBT was 32.2%. Patients who did not have hypertension (adjusted OR: 3.33; 95% CI: 2.44, 4.54), did not have CRC symptoms (adjusted OR: 3.15; 95% CI:1.26, 7.89), had the test offered by either medical assistants (adjusted OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.71, 3.49) or nurses (adjusted OR: 2.41; 95% CI 1.65, 3.51), did not have diabetes (adjusted OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.42, 2.77),and were not active smokers (adjusted OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.47), were more likely to refuse the iFOBT. The common reasons of refusing the test included “feeling not ready for the test” (21.6%) and “feeling healthy” (14.9%). The iFOBT was refused by one-third of the average-risk individuals from semi-urban communities. The associated factors and reasons of refusal found in this study could guide policymakers in developing targeted interventions to boost the uptake of CRC screening in Malaysia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. S605-S605
Author(s):  
Jean Mbachu ◽  
Robin David ◽  
Fanny Galeano ◽  
Arouj Bajwa ◽  
Amy Wozniak ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 522-522
Author(s):  
C Jorissen ◽  
F Lansink ◽  
P.J. Cuyle ◽  
M Bronswijk

A 60-year-old fecal occult blood test-positive patient was referred to our center to undergo colonoscopy. Two diminutive sessile polyps were detected, macroscopically compatible with sessile serrated lesions (SSL), which were resected using cold-snare polypectomy. Furthermore, a bulging appendiceal orifice was identified with mucoid appearance (Figure 1, left). Biopsies were taken and abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed (Figure 1, right). What is the diagnosis and which treatment would you consider?


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253369
Author(s):  
Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz ◽  
Núria Milà ◽  
Carmen Vidal ◽  
Judith Rocamora ◽  
Víctor Moreno ◽  
...  

Introduction The effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs is directly related to participation and the number of interval CRCs. The objective was to analyse specific-mortality in a cohort of individuals invited to a CRC screening program according to type of CRC diagnosis (screen-detected cancers, interval cancers, and cancers among the non-uptake group). Material and methods Retrospective cohort that included invitees aged 50–69 years of a CRC screening program (target population of 85,000 people) in Catalonia (Spain) from 2000–2015 with mortality follow-up until 2020. A screen-detected CRC was a cancer diagnosed after a positive faecal occult blood test (guaiac or immunochemical); an interval cancer was a cancer diagnosed after a negative test result and before the next invitation to the program (≤24 months); a non-uptake cancer was a cancer in subjects who declined screening. Results A total of 624 people were diagnosed with CRC (n = 265 screen-detected, n = 103 interval cancers, n = 256 non-uptake). In the multivariate analysis, we observed a 74% increase in mortality rate in the group with interval CRC compared to screen-detected CRC adjusted for age, sex, location and stage (HR: 1.74%, 95% CI:1.08–2.82, P = 0.02). These differences were found even when we restricted for advanced-cancers participants. In the stratified analysis for type of faecal occult blood test, a lower mortality rate was only observed among FIT screen-detected CRCs. Conclusion CRC screening with the FIT was associated with a significant reduction in CRC mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document