scholarly journals CAD/CAM Technology and Fabrication of Ceramic Inlay for an Endodontically Treated Tooth

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Castellanos E. Mauricio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-210
Author(s):  
  Meriem Ben Miled ◽  
Rihab Dakhli ◽  
Mohsen Maaned ◽  
Hayet Hajjami ◽  
Mounir Cherif
Keyword(s):  
Cad Cam ◽  

1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro TORII ◽  
Kousuke ITOU ◽  
Toshiyuki ITOTA ◽  
Kazuhiro HAMA ◽  
Norifumi KONISHI ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 296
Author(s):  
Marília Pivetta Rippe ◽  
Elen Guerra ◽  
Arianne Vallim Pinto Coelho ◽  
Lilian Costa Anami ◽  
Renata Marques de Melo Marinho ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal and marginal adaptation of inlays fabricated from different types of impressions (conventional and digital) and different ceramics (feldspathic and lithium disilicate). <strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Forty premolars were prepared for all-ceramic inlay restoration and assigned to 4 groups (n=10), according to the impression method (conventional with addition silicone and digital impressions) and ceramic type (lithium disilicate and feldspathic ceramic blocks). For each type of impression, 10 inlays were fabricated from lithium disilicate blocks and the other 10 from feldspathic ceramic blocks, by means of the CAD-CAM system. The internal adaptation was analyzed by replica. The marginal fit was analyzed under a stereomicroscope by directly measuring the gap formed between the inlay and the tooth in the proximal and occlusal regions. <strong>Results:</strong> The marginal or internal adaptations were not affected by type of impression (conventional = digital impression), irrespective of the ceramic type. Only the internal adaptation was affected by material, i.e., feldspathic ceramic had lower values than disilicate ceramic, when considering the digital impression. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> The conventional and digital impressions promote similar marginal and internal adaptation of tested feldspathic and disilicate ceramic inlays. For digital impression the feldspathic ceramic showed better internal adaptation than lithium disilicate. </p><p><strong>Keywords</strong></p><p>Ceramics; Dental internal adaptation; Dental marginal adaptation; Dental impression technique.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Chul-Woo Baek ◽  
Cheol-Woo Park ◽  
Jun-Sub Park ◽  
Jae-Jun Ryu

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Andressa Cristina Da Silva Queiroz ◽  
Robson De Lima Gomes ◽  
Gregorio Marcio De Figueiredo Rodrigues ◽  
Viviane Figueiredo

INTRODUCTION: The temporary fixed denture is an important part of the treatment, being an intermediate phase necessary for the manufacture of the definitive denture. OBJECTIVE: Present materials and their properties; as well as the techniques for making provisionals in Fixed Prosthesis, through an integrative literature review. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Search for the articles took place in the BVS and PubMed, published in portuguese and english, between 2000 and 2020. The search strategy used was: (Denture, Partial, Temporary) AND (Polymers) AND (Denture, Partial, Fixed) AND ("Dental Prosthesis" OR "Flexural Strength" OR "Dental Polishing"). The inclusion criteria were complete studies and available; studies of temporary fixed denture on teeth. The exclusion criteria were studies of provisional prostheses on implants. The complete data of the selected texts were extracted by the reviewers. Techniques for temporary fixed denture were presented regarding the stages of preparation, literature reviews and case reports. RESULTS: The studies addressed the application of different materials and techniques, in addition to laboratory research being prevalent. There was a heterogeneity between study objects and variables, with emphasis on the use of different polymers, techniques and adding reinforcement. CONCLUSION: The revised literature presented several of temporary materials. The techniques reported were the use of silicone mold, acetate matrix and CAD / CAM. And the most common techniques to be performed in the daily clinic were adaptation of the stock facet (on the preparation tooth and endodontically treated tooth), adapted resin or ball and silicone mold or matrix.


1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 540-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. KAWAHATA ◽  
H. ONO ◽  
Y. NISHI ◽  
T. HAMANO ◽  
E. NAGAOKA
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
J C Bowell
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document