Colloquium: The Creative and Expressive Arts in Education, Research and Therapy–Focus on China

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-28
Author(s):  
S.K. Levine
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-68
Author(s):  
Kyoko Ono ◽  
Kana Okazaki-Sakaue ◽  
Shoichi Machida ◽  
Yukari Sakiyama

1990 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen T. Dixon ◽  
F. Graeme Chalmers

2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Gaztambide-Fernández

In this essay Rubén A. Gaztambide-Fernández uses a discursive approach to argue that mainstream arts in education scholarship and advocacy construes “the arts” as a definable naturalistic phenomenon that exists in the world and is available to be observed and measured. In the course of his analysis, he examines how this construction is employed through what he calls the rhetoric of effects as part of the mainstream discourses used in arts in education research today. He describes how this positivistic rhetoric masks the complexity of those practices and processes associated with the arts, limiting the possibilities for productively employing such practices in education. In addition, he explores how discourses of the arts both arise out of and continually reify hierarchical conceptions of artistic practices in education and broader society. He concludes by proposing an alternative rhetoric of cultural production, arguing that moving toward this new way of understanding practices and processes of symbolic creativity is critical for expanding our vision for the arts in education.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketevan Mamiseishvili

In this paper, I will illustrate the changing nature and complexity of faculty employment in college and university settings. I will use existing higher education research to describe changes in faculty demographics, the escalating demands placed on faculty in the work setting, and challenges that confront professors seeking tenure or administrative advancement. Boyer’s (1990) framework for bringing traditionally marginalized and neglected functions of teaching, service, and community engagement into scholarship is examined as a model for balancing not only teaching, research, and service, but also work with everyday life.


2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-250
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Scruggs ◽  
Margo A. Mastropieri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document