scholarly journals Performance of the Gail and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk assessment models in women screened in a primary care setting with the FHS-7 questionnaire

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1 suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 232-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Sales Luiz Vianna ◽  
Juliana Giacomazzi ◽  
Cristina Brinckmann Oliveira Netto ◽  
Luciana Neves Nunes ◽  
Maira Caleffi ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (S1) ◽  
pp. 230-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa L. Bondy ◽  
Lisa A. Newman

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly-Anne Phillips ◽  
Emma J. Steel ◽  
Ian Collins ◽  
Jon Emery ◽  
Marie Pirotta ◽  
...  

To capitalise on advances in breast cancer prevention, all women would need to have their breast cancer risk formally assessed. With ~85% of Australians attending primary care clinics at least once a year, primary care is an opportune location for formal breast cancer risk assessment and management. This study assessed the current practice and needs of primary care clinicians regarding assessment and management of breast cancer risk. Two facilitated focus group discussions were held with 17 primary care clinicians (12 GPs and 5 practice nurses (PNs)) as part of a larger needs assessment. Primary care clinicians viewed assessment and management of cardiovascular risk as an intrinsic, expected part of their role, often triggered by practice software prompts and facilitated by use of an online tool. Conversely, assessment of breast cancer risk was not routine and was generally patient- (not clinician-) initiated, and risk management (apart from routine screening) was considered outside the primary care domain. Clinicians suggested that routine assessment and management of breast cancer risk might be achieved if it were widely endorsed as within the remit of primary care and supported by an online risk-assessment and decision aid tool that was integrated into primary care software. This study identified several key issues that would need to be addressed to facilitate the transition to routine assessment and management of breast cancer risk in primary care, based largely on the model used for cardiovascular disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1543-1543
Author(s):  
Joseph Merriman ◽  
Balmatee Bidassie ◽  
Amanda Kovach ◽  
Marissa Vallette ◽  
Yeun-Hee Anna Park ◽  
...  

1543 Background: Despite recommended guidelines and available medicationsto reduce breast cancer risk by up to 50-65%, <5% of the 10 million eligible women are offered chemoprevention in the U.S. The comfort level, practice patterns, and barriers to breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention use within the VA have not been reported. Methods: We assessed VA primary care providers using a REDcap survey. We obtained provider demographics, use and comfort level with breast cancer risk models and chemoprevention and knowledge about chemoprevention. Data was analyzed with Fishers exact or chi-square tests. Results: Of the 200 survey respondents, 167 were included for analysis. Overall, 30% used the Gail model monthly or more often, and 1.5 % prescribed chemoprevention in the last 2 years. Fewer than 30% correctly answered chemoprevention knowledge questions. Designated women's health providers were more comfortable with risk assessment and chemoprevention (p<.046, p<.004) and used risk models more often (p<.045). 63% expressed interest in education about breast cancer prevention. Conclusions: Breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention use by VA primary care is limited by lack of comfort and familiarity. Women's health providers are more comfortable and knowledgeable about breast cancer risk models and chemoprevention, offering an opportunity for partnership with high-risk oncologists to improve breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention use among female Veterans.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document