Nest Predators of Ground-nesting Birds in Montane Forest of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona

2010 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 614-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Kirkpatrick ◽  
Courtney J. Conway
1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 241 ◽  
Author(s):  
WF Laurance ◽  
JD Grant

Automatic cameras triggered by infrared beams were used to identify animals visiting artificial groundnests in north Queensland rainforest. In 1992-93 six cameras and nests were established at four sites ranging from 340 to 840m in elevation, and a total of 279 identifiable photographs of nest visitors were recorded. White-tailed rats (Uromys caudimaculatus) comprised 74% of all photographs and were the most frequent visitor at five of six nests. Bush rats (Rattus fuscipes) were second in frequency (17%), with other small mammals (Rattus leucopus, Melomys cervinipes, Perameles nasuta), birds (Ailuroedus melanotis, Pitta versicolor) and reptiles (Varanus varius) each accounting for less than 2% of nest visits. Omnivorous rodents comprised the large majority (96%) of visits and may be significant predators on nests of some ground-nesting birds in Australian tropical rainforest.


2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham R. Fulton

Reviews of nest predation call for the identification of nest predators. The identity of nest predators is perhaps most poorly known for ground-nesting birds. Marsupials are not generally regarded as potential nest-predators of these birds, partly because the biology of rare Australian marsupials is not fully understood due to their rarity. This study identified three marsupials – boodie (Bettongia lesueur), woylie (Bettongia penicillata) and brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) – taking eggs from artificial nests modelled on that of the threatened painted button-quail (Turnix varius). Approximately one-third of the eggs were taken by the two bettongs and another third by the brushtail possum. I present dietary evidence of bettongs consuming vertebrate items including taking live prey to provide external validation for the notion that they may depredate natural nests. I suggest that more research is required on the impacts of reintroductions to avoid deleterious effects on resident species.


Erdkunde ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Dislich ◽  
Sven Günter ◽  
Jürgen Homeier ◽  
Boris Schröder ◽  
Andreas Huth

The Condor ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niall H.K. Burton

Abstract The relationship between nest entrance orientation and latitude among ground-nesting passerines was reviewed using published information. Data were collated for seven North American and European species. Pooling within-species comparisons, there was a clear trend from a preference for north-facing nests at lower latitudes to eastward- or southward-facing nests farther north. Orientations differed significantly in eight of 12 cases for which statistical comparison was possible, means differing in the expected direction in six of these cases. These results highlight how the influence of solar radiation on nest microclimate typically delineates preferred nest orientation in these species, i.e., at lower latitudes, the need for shade results in a preference for northward orientations; at mid latitudes, eastward orientations predominate, reflecting a probable balance between the benefits of warmth in the early morning and shade in the afternoon; while at high latitudes, nests may be oriented southward to gain warmth throughout the day.


Author(s):  
Michael D. Ulyshen ◽  
Audrey C. Wilson ◽  
Gunnar C. Ohlson ◽  
Scott M. Pokswinksi ◽  
John K. Hiers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document