Room tilt illusion in epilepsy

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 901-905
Author(s):  
Deema Fattal ◽  
Anne-Sophie Wattiez ◽  
Erik St Louis ◽  
Karina Gonzalez-Otarula ◽  
Rup Sainju
Keyword(s):  
Tilt Illusion

The Effect of Local and Global Visual Cues on the Tilt Illusion

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Ellen L. Schroeder ◽  
Amber Levendusky
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cues ◽  
Tilt Illusion

The effect of inducing-line length on the magnitudes of the tilt illusion and aftereffect1

1975 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Wenderoth ◽  
Brain O'toole ◽  
Ian Curthoys
Keyword(s):  
Line Length ◽  
Tilt Illusion

Room tilt illusion in superior cerebellar artery stroke: Are we missing the classical neurological examination?

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Míriam Eimil-Ortiz ◽  
InésPecharromándeLas Heras ◽  
CarlosLópez de Silanes de Miguel ◽  
Marta González-Salaices ◽  
MiguelA Sáiz-Sepúlveda
Keyword(s):  
Neurological Examination ◽  
Superior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Tilt Illusion ◽  
Cerebellar Artery

Obliquity Integration: Variations on a Theme of Delbœuf

Perception ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 705-712
Author(s):  
Giovanni B Vicario ◽  
Giulio Vidotto ◽  
Elena Zambianchi
Keyword(s):  
Frame Of Reference ◽  
The Other ◽  
Geometrical Illusion ◽  
Tilt Illusion ◽  
Variations On A Theme ◽  
Rod And Frame

An optical—geometrical illusion, described by Delbœuf and not familiar to specialists, is investigated. The results of two experiments show that the divergence between a bar filled with parallel slanting lines and a line drawn above it is clearly related to this angle of the lines which fill the bar. The illusion is already present when this angle is 10°, reaches its maximum at 20°, decreases at 30°, and almost disappears at 40°. These results are similar to those found for the tilt illusion, are slightly different from those found for the rod-and-frame illusion, and differ greatly from those found for the Zöllner illusion. The other variables considered—the distance between the slanting lines filling up the bar, the distance between the upper line and the bar, and the width of the bar—do not influence the illusion as much. Since either the line appears as diverging from the bar, or the bar seems inclined in relation to the line, the illusion should be considered a complex one. The small oblique lines inside the bar induce obliquity in the opposite sense in the display, but which of the elements is seen as diverging from the other depends on which of the two is established as the frame of reference.

scholarly journals Endogenous attention can reduce the tilt illusion, but not crowding

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 126-126
Author(s):  
I. Mareschal ◽  
J. Solomon ◽  
M. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Endogenous Attention ◽  
Tilt Illusion

Lateral inhibition between banks of orientation selective channels predicts shape context effects: A tilt-illusion field

2022 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 107975
Author(s):  
J. Edwin Dickinson ◽  
Ruby A. Martin ◽  
David R. Badcock
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Inhibition ◽  
Context Effects ◽  
Shape Context ◽  
Tilt Illusion

Perceptual segmentation and neural grouping in tilt illusion

2000 ◽  
Vol 32-33 ◽  
pp. 979-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko Sakai ◽  
Shigeru Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Tilt Illusion ◽  
Perceptual Segmentation

Visually and posturally mediated tilt illusion in Parkinson's disease and in labyrinthine defective subjects

Neurology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Bronstein ◽  
L. Yardley ◽  
A. P. Moore ◽  
L. Cleeves
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Tilt Illusion

scholarly journals The Flip Tilt Illusion: Visible in Peripheral Vision as Predicted by the Central-Peripheral Dichotomy

i-Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 204166952093840
Author(s):  
Li Zhaoping
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Peripheral Vision ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Tilt Illusion ◽  
Visual Areas ◽  
Vertically Aligned ◽  
Visual Cortical ◽  
Higher Visual Areas

Consider a gray field comprising pairs of vertically aligned dots; in each pair, one dot is white the other black. When viewed in a peripheral visual field, these pairs appear horizontally aligned. By the Central-Peripheral Dichotomy, this flip tilt illusion arises because top-down feedback from higher to lower visual cortical areas is too weak or absent in the periphery to veto confounded feedforward signals from the primary visual cortex (V1). The white and black dots in each pair activate, respectively, on and off subfields of V1 neural receptive fields. However, the sub-fields’ orientations, and the preferred orientations, of the most activated neurons are orthogonal to the dot alignment. Hence, V1 reports the flip tilt to higher visual areas. Top-down feedback vetoes such misleading reports, but only in the central visual field.

Room tilt illusion and persistent hiccups as presenting symptoms of a left PICA stroke: a case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 469-471
Author(s):  
Umberto Pensato ◽  
Roberto D’Angelo ◽  
Rita Rinaldi ◽  
Maria Guarino ◽  
Pietro Cortelli
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Tilt Illusion ◽  
Presenting Symptoms
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document