scholarly journals Anatomical and functional outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment

Author(s):  
Veysel Cankurtaran ◽  
Mehmet Citirik ◽  
Mert Simsek ◽  
Kemal Tekin ◽  
Mehmet Yasin Teke
2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yog Raj Sharma ◽  
Sathiyan Karunanithi ◽  
Raj Vardhan Azad ◽  
Rajpal Vohra ◽  
Nikhil Pal ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 920-924
Author(s):  
Miroslav Stamenkovic ◽  
Ivan Stefanovic ◽  
Ivan Sencanic ◽  
Vesna Jaksic ◽  
Milka Mavija ◽  
...  

Background/Aim. Among the proposed operative techniques for retinal detachment (RD) the most commonly applied are classical method with scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). The aim of this paper was to determine which surgical intervention of these two leads to better morphological results in terms of the applied retina and better functional outcomes in terms of visual acuity (VA) of the operated eye in patients with RD. Methods. A retrospective study on the comparative section of the effects of scleral buckling surgery and PPV in uncomplicated rhegmatogenous RD was performed. In a 2-year period 97 patients, i.e. 98 eyes with RD were operated on (68 eyes with scleral buckling surgery vs 30 by PPV). Results. In the group with classically operated detachment, the retina was applied in 52 (76.5%) cases vs 30 (100%) patients in PPV group (p < 0.05). Postoperative VA in logMAR was significantly better in both groups compared to preoperative VA: in the classically operated was 1.89 ? 1.04 preoperatively vs 0.98 ? 0.70 postoperatively, while in the PPV group, preoperative value was 2.56 ? 0.67 vs 1.31 ? 0.74 postoperatively (p = 0.001). Conclusion. PPV in uncomplicated forms of RD gives better anatomical results than scleral buckling surgery. VA was significantly improved in both observed groups, while its mean value was postoperatively better in the group that was operated with the classical method. The reason for this could be due to better VA in baseline in the scleral buckling surgery group.


2008 ◽  
Vol 247 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brice Dugas ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Lafontaine ◽  
Alexandre Guillaubey ◽  
Jean-Paul Berrod ◽  
Isabelle Hubert ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 234 (9) ◽  
pp. 561-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinrich Heimann ◽  
Norbert Bornfeld ◽  
Wilko Friedrichs ◽  
Horst Helbig ◽  
Ulrich Kellner ◽  
...  

Supplemental scleral buckling techniques in vitrectomy for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment to achieve higher reattachment rates are not widely used but may be useful especially in complicated cases. In this article, the positive and negative aspects of adding scleral buckle to primary vitrectomy will be examined by looking at relevant studies.


Retinal detachment is one of the most important causes of visual loss. Scleral buckling, pneumatic retinopexy, or primary vitrectomy techniques are the state of art treatment approaches for retinal detachment. Novel improvements in instruments and techniques of vitreoretinal surgery have led primary vitrectomy to be more preferable for retinal detachment surgery. Performing primary vitrectomy in selected patients, considering the advantages and disadvantages has a significant impact in terms of prognosis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Hyuk Koh ◽  
Moon Jeong Choi ◽  
Sung Won Cho ◽  
Tae Gon Lee ◽  
Jae Heung Lee

Ophthalmology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1421-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Ahmadieh ◽  
Siamak Moradian ◽  
Hooshang Faghihi ◽  
Mohammad M. Parvaresh ◽  
Heshmatollah Ghanbari ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document