scholarly journals Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without fixation

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 712-716
Author(s):  
S V Tarasenko ◽  
A Yu Bogomolov ◽  
A A Natal'skiy ◽  
O V Zaytsev ◽  
O D Peskov ◽  
...  

Aim. Comparison of the immediate and long-term results of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with and without mesh implant fixation. Methods. The study included 145 patients over 18 years of both genders with inguinal hernias, including those with relapse after auto-hernioplasty. Patients underwent transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty with the application of mesh implant. Patients were randomly divided into two groups matched by age, sex and the type of hernias. In group 1 (n=71) patients underwent laparoscopic hernia repair without fixation, which in case of a direct inguinal hernia was supplemented with transverse fascia endoloop plication; and in group 2 (n=74) - laparoscopic hernioplasty using hernia stapler and/or endocorporal suture. Results. The duration of surgical intervention in compared groups did not differ significantly (p=0.92), there was no recurrence of hernia in either group. The patients of group 1 had less pain syndrome in the early postoperative period, which was expressed in a significantly lower need for narcotic analgesics in terms of the equivalent amount of morphine (p=0.03) and shorter duration of hospital stay (p=0.5). Advantages of laparoscopic hernioplasty without fixation are the following: (1) intensity of pain syndrome in patients operated by this method is less than in patients operated by the traditional method, during both the first 24 hours after the surgery (p=0.45) and on day 5 (p=0.69); (2) there is no need to purchase foreign-made devices (hernia staplers) and self-locking endoprostheses. Conclusion. The long-term and immediate results of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh implant fixation are not inferior to the traditional methods of implant application; besides, the studied method has a raw of advantages.

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 2109-2121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lava Y. Patel ◽  
Brittany Lapin ◽  
Matthew E. Gitelis ◽  
Craig Brown ◽  
John G. Linn ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 764
Author(s):  
Sridar Govindaraj ◽  
A. P. Roshini ◽  
Clement Prakash ◽  
Pavithra B.

Background: Inguinal hernias are the most common conditions presenting to the surgical department, which is repaired either with open technique or laparoscopically, Total Extra Peritoneal (TEP) or Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP). Each procedure has its own advantages and drawbacks, none of them have been declared as the gold standard.Methods: Author did a prospective cohort study in a tertiary care hospital to assess the predictors and compare the outcomes for Open and Laparoscopic (TEP/TAPP) Inguinal hernia repair. A total of 180 patients were recruited into the study and followed up for a period of 1 year. Descriptive and inferential statistics was used to analyze the data.Results: 131 (72.8%) underwent open hernioplasty and 49 (27.2%) underwent laparoscopic hernioplasty. There was a significant difference between the time taken to complete an open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (p=0.004), with laparoscopic repair taking lesser operating time. Laparoscopy was converted to open repair in 3 (6.1%) patients. Mean pain scores at 6-hours post-operative was 5.28±1.355 with no difference in the pain among patients who underwent open and laparoscopic repair. Seroma or hematoma are known complications, which was seen more in the open technique. The reason for choosing open surgery was secondary to the higher cost of laparoscopic repair (Adjusted Odds Ratio=0.168, p=0.004).Conclusions: The outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair are comparable to that with the open repair.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document