Clinical outcome of appendectomy: laparoscopic vs open technique

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common abdominal surgical emergency. Appendectomy has been proven to be the standard care for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Objective of the study was to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in terms of clinical outcome and complication rates.Methods: This was a single centric, retrospective study conducted at SKIMS, Soura from May 2018 to April 2021. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy patients were compared in terms of operative times, conversion rate, complication rates and duration of hospital stay.Results: Total 120 patients were included in this study with 40 in laparoscopic group while 80 patients in the open group. Increased operative time in laparoscopic group (p=0.033) and longer duration of hospital stay (p=0.021) with open group while as comparable complication rate in both procedures were observed. Higher rates of intra-abdominal collection in laparoscopic group as compared to open groupConclusions: Both laparoscopic and open appendectomy procedures can be performed routinely for acute appendicitis without the additional risks of complications.

Intrathoracic Giant Mass with Anomalous Vascular Origin in an Asymptomatic Patient: A Case Report

Diagnostic and surgical difficulties were presented in case of a giant mass, found incidentally, in a 65-year-old healthy and asymptomatic man. The patient underwent different diagnostic procedures. Surgery was the treatment of choice. A combination of both open technique and videothoracoscopy to reduce the risk of seeding, pending a certain diagnosis, was resolutive. The postoperative period and recovery time were uneventful. The patient was discharged on the 5th postoperative day. The histological diagnosis was benign schwannoma. There are different aspects to think about, based also on the experience of each center. According to our experience, this is a rare situation; the combined surgical techniques to control the vascular risk and tissue infiltration of the mass seemed to us the approach of choice.

Comparison of two Different Surgical Modalities in the treatment of Pilonidal Sinus (Primary Closure and Open Technique)

Background: Pilonidal sinus is disease of young age andits prevalence is higher in men compared to women (almost twice).It is a disease that arises from hair follicles particularly present in the natal cleft. It occurs commonly in Jeep Drivers and hence gets the name from there “Jeep Drivers Disease” and also commonly occurs in Barbers. It leads to formation of abscesses and chronic wounds with discharge and pain. Disease can have huge impact on social life and quality of life. In most cases the treatment is incision and drainage. Study design: It is a case series study. Place and duration of study: Department of General Surgery at Shaikh Zayed Hospital Lahore from January 2019 to January 2021. Aim: To compare the relative effects of open and closed surgical techniques on the recurrence rate, rate of infection and time of healing for pilonidal sinus. Methodology: Patients with pilonidal sinus disease from January 2019 to January 2021 received surgical treatment either excision followed by primary closure as in closed technique (group A) or excision followed by leaving the wound open for healing by secondary intention as in open technique (group B). Surgical management is widely based upon two techniques open and closed. In open technique wound is left open and heals by secondary intention while in closed technique it is closed primarily and heals by primary intention. The better choice between these two techniques is still a topic of debate. Results: The most common age group for pilonidal sinus was between 16-25 years of age. The mean age came out to be 26.7 years. The mean healing time was 15 days in group A and 42 days in group B. The duration of hospital stay ranged between 2-8 days for group A and 5-16 days for group B. Early postoperative complications seen was infection in 1 patient (7.69%) in group A and 5 patients (35.71%) in group B and these cases were managed conservatively.1 (7.69%) case of aseptic gaping of wound after stitch removal was seen in group A and was managed with closed technique. Recurrences reported in group A was 1 case (7.69%) at 6 months and was surgically managed by open technique. There were a total of 4 (28.57%) recurrences which were left open to heal by granulation. Conclusion: It is concluded that better management option for pilonidal sinus disease is primary closure of defect. So it is suggested that management of pilonidal sinus disease should be individualized but preference must be given to closure of wound after excision. Keywords: Pilonidal sinus, Primary Closure, Open Technique.

P013 HOW TO IMPROVE TREATMENT OF COMPLEX INCISIONAL HERNIAS IN OBESE PATIENTS: A SINGLE-CENTRE STUDY, AN EVALUATION OF LESS-OPEN TECHNIQUE AND FREE-FIXATION TECHNIQUE

Aim Surgery of a complex incisional hernia in an obese patient is a challenging procedure for hernia surgeons. The aim of a new approach is to reduce complications such as pain and wound events, without increasing the number of recurrences. Material and Methods Adults with BMI more than 35 who underwent open, elective operation of a complex incisional hernia (with horizontal diameter more than 12cm) including posterior component separation technique with TAR (transversus abdominis muscle release) and retromuscular synthetic large-pore mesh placement, were identified. Patients were divided into 2 groups: The first group was treated with standard open technique with fixation using interrupted stitches, and the second group was treated with a technique using light hook and no or reduced fixation in the upper and lower pole of the mesh. For post-operative complication evaluation, the Clavien-Dindo classification was used. We have also evaluated an average operation time, length of stay, duration of opioid need. The long-term follow-up was 6 – 48 months. Results There was no significant difference in length of stay, the need of analgetic treatment, and hernia recurrence. Shorter operation time, and lower occurrence of surgical-site infections were reported in the second group, but it was not significant. Conclusions Open posterior component separation technique with TAR using large-pore mesh and no/minimal fixation seems to be a safe and sufficient method of treatment for complex incisional hernias in obese patients. Alternative methods may reduce early complications and pain and do not increase number of recurrences. A larger group of patients and longer follow-up should be needed to improve these findings.

Are Only A Few Hours Adequate For Hospitalization Following Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy In Pediatric Patients?

Purpose- A very short hospital length of stay following an open appendectomy in children with acute simple appendicitis has never been mentioned yet in literature. The authors reviewed the outcome of these pediatric patients who were treated with the open technique.Methods -We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the 115 consecutive patients who underwent open appendectomy from June 2017 to July 2021.Results- There were 84 patients whose appendices were inflammatory or suppurative and appendectomies were done only through McBurney’s point. Of these, the average age was 9.11 ± 2.67 years. The mean length of the incision was 1.95 ± 0.48 centimeters. Nearly one-third (25/85) could be discharged with 3 hours following surgery. Of the remaining cases, 9 patients were discharged within the same day.Conclusion- There were increased percentages of patients who were eligible for our criteria in each year. The confidence of both parents and the therapeutic team on this concept is of paramount importance affecting a shift of paradigm of this treatment of this very common surgical condition.

Incidental Durotomy Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease and the Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique on the Rate and Need for Surgical Revision: A Case Series

BACKGROUND Incidental durotomy (ID) is a common complication during lumbar spine surgery. A paucity of literature has studied the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on durotomy rates and strategies for repair as compared to open surgery. OBJECTIVE To examine the impact that MIS techniques have on the durotomy rate, repair techniques, and need for surgical revision following surgery for degenerative lumbar disease as compared to open technique. METHODS A single-center retrospective review of consecutive cases between 2013 and 2016 was performed. All patients underwent lumbar decompression with or without instrumented fusion for degenerative pathology using either open posterior or MIS techniques. ID rate, closure technique, and need for surgical revision related to the durotomy were recorded. RESULTS A total of 1,196 patients were included with an overall ID rate of 6.8%. There was no difference between open or minimally invasive surgical techniques (P = .14). There was a higher durotomy rate with open technique in patients that underwent decompression with fusion (P = .03) as well as in revision cases (P = .02). Primary repair was feasible more frequently in the open group (P = .001), whereas use of dural substitute (P < .001) was more common in the MIS group. Fibrin sealant was used routinely in both groups (P = .34). There were no failed repairs, regardless of technique used. CONCLUSION MIS techniques may reduce durotomies in cases involving instrumentation or revisions. Use of dural substitute onlay and fibrin sealant was effective at preventing reoperation. Both MIS and open techniques result in a low rate of future surgical revision when a durotomy occurs.