Reply to “Comment on ‘Estimation of Earthquake Hazard Parameters from Incomplete Data Files. Part III. Incorporation of Uncertainty of Earthquake‐Occurrence Model’ by Andrzej Kijko, Ansie Smit, and Markvard A. Sellevoll” by Gert Zöller

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Kijko ◽  
Ansie Smit ◽  
Markvard A. Sellevoll
Keyword(s):  
Incomplete Data ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Earthquake Occurrence ◽  
Earthquake Hazard Parameters ◽  
Data Files ◽  
Hazard Parameters

Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part I. Utilization of extreme and complete catalogs with different threshold magnitudes

1989 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-654
Author(s):  
A. Kijko ◽  
M. A. Sellevoll
Keyword(s):  
Likelihood Estimation ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Mixed Data ◽  
Earthquake Activity ◽  
Seismicity Parameters ◽  
Earthquake Hazard Parameters ◽  
Data Files ◽  
Hazard Parameters ◽  
Maximum Regional Magnitude

Abstract The maximum likelihood estimation of earthquake hazard parameters (maximum regional magnitude, mmax, earthquake activity rate λ, and b parameter in the Gutenberg-Richter equation) is extended to the case of mixed data containing large historical events and recent complete observations. The method accepts variable quality of complete data in different parts of a catalog with different threshold magnitude values. As an illustration, the procedure is applied for the estimation of seismicity parameters in the area of Calabria and eastern Sicily.

A Probabilistic Assessment of Earthquake Hazard Parameters in NW Himalaya and the Adjoining Regions

2011 ◽  
Vol 169 (9) ◽  
pp. 1619-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. S. Yadav ◽  
Yusuf Bayrak ◽  
J. N. Tripathi ◽  
S. Chopra ◽  
A. P. Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Probabilistic Assessment ◽  
Nw Himalaya ◽  
Earthquake Hazard Parameters ◽  
Hazard Parameters
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document