Attenuation of modified Mercalli intensity with distance in Mexico

1988 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1875-1884
Author(s):  
Mario Chávez ◽  
Raul Castro

Abstract Two relations are proposed to predict the attenuation of Modified Mercalli Intensity (I) with distance (D) for Mexican earthquakes, i.e. ln I = B 0 + B 1 ln ( D / D ' ) + B 2 ( D − D ' ) + B 3 ln M s ln I = B 0 + B 1 ( D / D ' ) + B 2 ln ( D − D ' ) + B 3 ln M s Ms is the earthquake surface-wave magnitude, D′ is a distance related to the maximum I mapped for an earthquake, I′ or to Ms. The coefficients Bi, i = 0, 1, 2, 3 were obtained by fitting in a least-square sense the information contained in the intensity maps of 32 events to the relations. Those events were classified in three groups according to their epicentral location, focal mechanism, and depth, i.e., events related to the subduction-zone intermediate-depth earthquakes in south-central Mexico and to shallow crustal events along the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. The I predicted by the proposed relations compare well with the I observed for historical earthquakes not included in the fitting. Results obtained from a parametrical study showed that the attenuation of I with D is different for each of the three types of earthquakes. For distances of less than about 200 km, the earthquakes associated with the subduction zone have a larger attenuation than the ones originating in the south-central region of Mexico; for greater distances (D > 200 km), the opposite behavior is observed. The events located in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt have a larger attenuation with distance than that of events in the other two regions. From these results, it seems advisable in Mexico to use several attenuation relations to estimate the seismic hazard at a site, depending on the particular tectonic setting and the path of the events under consideration.

2012 ◽  
Vol 522-523 ◽  
pp. 122-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Ferrari ◽  
Teresa Orozco-Esquivel ◽  
Vlad Manea ◽  
Marina Manea

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. A260520
Author(s):  
Edith Fuentes-Guzmán ◽  
Antoni Camprubí ◽  
Janet Gabites ◽  
Eduardo González-Partida ◽  
Vanessa Colás

The Xoconostle prospect in northeastern Michoacán state, south-central Mexico, is constituted by high sulfidation epithermal breccias and stockworks with Au and Hg prospective anomalies. The mineralization is hosted by latest Miocene to Pliocene rocks grouped into the El Terrero ignimbrite and the Siete Cruces dome complex and a stock of intermediate composition and undetermined (Pliocene?) age. Two alunite samples from deep hypogene advanced argillic alteration assemblages within the deposit yielded 40Ar/39Ar ages at 5.57 ± 0.44 (Messinian) and 3.67 ± 0.20 Ma (Zanclean). Such ages are in good agreement with those of volcanic rocks at a semi-regional scale, especially those associated with the nearby Amealco caldera. Assuming that the formation of Xoconostle deposit could be genetically related to any of the eruptive units in this caldera, it would be associated with dacitic-andesitic rocks at ~4.7 Ma or with bimodal andesite-basalt volcanism at ~3.7 Ma, with which rhyolites at the southwest rim of the caldera (nearer to the epithermal deposit) are contemporaneous. The obtained ages are also in good agreement with those determined for the youngest stages in the evolution of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB). In addition, such ages compare well with those established for the E-W striking Morelia-Acambay normal fault zone (or Acambay graben). The occurrence of E-W structural features in the study area support their correlation with those in the Acambay graben. Although the metallogenesis of the TMVB needs further endeavours that contribute to its understanding, the Xoconostle prospect adds up to other dated magmatic-hydrothermal deposits that may collectively constitute a Pliocene metallogenic province whose inception was geologically circumscribed to this volcanic arc. However, this and its companion papers in this issue confirm the metallogenic potential of the TMVB in most of its stages of evolution, particularly in the late Miocene-Pliocene stage of acid and bimodal volcanism.


Tectonics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 3544-3562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Suárez ◽  
Gema V. Caballero‐Jiménez ◽  
David A. Novelo‐Casanova

Lithos ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 93 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 149-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Orozco-Esquivel ◽  
Chiara M. Petrone ◽  
Luca Ferrari ◽  
Takahiro Tagami ◽  
Piero Manetti

2006 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gomez-Tuena ◽  
C. H. Langmuir ◽  
S. L. Goldstein ◽  
S. M. Straub ◽  
F. Ortega-Gutierrez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document