scholarly journals The Availability of Temporary Injunctive Relief for Protecting U.S. Intellectual Property Rights from Infringing Imports Under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930

1991 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-280
Author(s):  
Ronald K. Aust
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Injunctive Relief ◽  
Section 337

Injunctions

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaani Riordan
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
European Union Law ◽  
Injunctive Relief ◽  
Safe Harbours

This chapter considers several limitations upon the availability, nature, and scope of injunctive remedies available against internet intermediaries. These limitations derive from four main sources: general principles of injunctive relief, European Union law, human rights law, and specific doctrinal rules. Some are of universal application; others apply in more limited fields, such as the grant of interim injunctions, the enforcement of intellectual property rights, or to particular classes of defendants. With some exceptions, they are not specific to the internet, or even to intermediaries, and so apply in other domains and to other parties as well. This chapter divides these rules into general limitations and those specific to intellectual property. Safe harbours are addressed separately in chapter 12.

Intellectual Property Rights for Engineers

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivien Irish
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KARYA SENI BATIK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Work Of Art

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document