scholarly journals Comparative study of maternal and fetal outcome between low and normal amniotic fluid index at term

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 640
Author(s):  
Gayatri Mathuriya ◽  
Megha Verma ◽  
Sudha Rajpoot
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Ready Availability ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Low Risk Pregnancy

Background: Amniotic fluid index (AFI) is kind of an estimate of the amount of amniotic fluid. It is an index for the fetal well-being. The aim was to study fetal and maternal out come in cases of low AFI and normal AFI.Methods: This was a case control prospective comparative study performed on 200 randomly selected low risk pregnant patients at term (37-40 weeks of gestation) admitted in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department. 100 patients with AFI <5 cm (cases) and 100 patients with AFI 8-20 cm (control).Results: Increased number of LSCS in cases that is 35 while only 10 in control and almost equal incidences of MSL and FD in both the groups, while in cases 17 women were planned for elective LSCS for various indications in expectation of better fetal outcome.  There was significant low APGAR score in babies of cases, but clinically we refute this. In present study almost double the no. of babies in cases was IUGR or FGR. Significant association between low AFI and congenital anomalies in babies. Most of the anomalies were of urinary tract system.Conclusions: An AFI ≤5 cm detected at term that was at or after 37 completed weeks of gestation in a low risk pregnancy was an indicator of poor perinatal outcome. Oligohydramnios was being detected more frequently now-a-days due to ready availability of ultrasonography these days.

scholarly journals Role of admission cardiotocography and amniotic fluid index on perinatal outcome in low risk pregnancy at term

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1591
Author(s):  
Manasi Patnaik ◽  
Tejaswini M ◽  
Sudhanshu Kumar Rath ◽  
Shaik Afrah Naaz
Keyword(s):  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Low Risk Pregnancy

Background: Fetal surveillance even in normal or low risk pregnancy is essential to ensure safe parturition with minimum intervention. Cardiotocography (CTG) and clinical estimation of amniotic fluid volume (AFV) measured as amniotic fluid index (AFI) are two tests that are easily available in the labor room and can be used to identify fetal well-being. Our study aimed to evaluate role of admission cardiotocography (CTG) and amniotic fluid index (AFI) on perinatal outcome in low risk pregnancy at term.Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective observational study. All low risk pregnant women at term admitted to the labor ward in early or established labour between September 2018 and August 2020 were included in the study. They underwent admission CTG and AFI assessment using ultrasonography. All parameters including CTG changes, mode of delivery, AFI, presence of meconium, APGAR score at 1 and 5 mins, need for admission in neonatal ICU and perinatal mortality were recorded. Quantitative data was compared using chi square test.Results: A total of 180 patients were included in the study. Majority of the women belonged to the age group of 30-35 years. Abnormal CTG showing fetal distress was seen in 105 (58.33%) cases. Non-reactive CTG was significantly associated with meconium stained liqour, requirement for LSCS, still birth, fetal distress, APGAR <7 at 1 and 5min and NICU admission (p<0.001). The association of low AFI with non-reactive CTG had statistically significant impact on perinatal outcomes like low birth weight, requirement for LSCS, fetal distress, APGAR <7 at 1 and 5 mins and NICU admissions.Conclusions: Admission CTG is a simple non-invasive test that can serve as a screening tool in low risk obstetric population to detect fetal distress already present or likely to develop and prevent unnecessary delay in intervention. Thus, it may help in preventing fetal morbidity and mortality.

scholarly journals Intrapartum Amniotic Fluid Volume Estimation in Low-risk Pregnancy as a Predictor of Perinatal Outcome

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 156-158
Author(s):  
J Jeanet ◽  
Santosh Joseph Benjamin ◽  
Jiji Elizabeth Mathews ◽  
Swati Rathore ◽  
Ajit Sebastian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Fluid Volume ◽  
Volume Estimation ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Volume ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Low Risk Pregnancy

ABSTRACT Objectives The study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of routine estimation of amniotic fluid volume using the amniotic fluid index (AFI) as a means of predicting an adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk pregnancies. Materials and methods Five hundred and three singleton lowrisk pregnancies with cephalic presentation between 37 and 40 weeks and 6 days of gestation with intact or ruptured membranes had AFI estimations within 36 hours of delivery. Results The frequency of nonreassuring fetal heart patterns and perinatal outcomes among patients with oligohydramnios (<5 cm), borderline oligohydramnios (5 to 8 cm) and normal (>8 cm) liquor were compared and not found to be different. Cesarean section for nonreassuring fetal status was also similar in the three groups. Conclusion This study suggests that AFI estimation during labor in low-risk pregnancies does not predict adverse perinatal outcomes. Further studies are needed to verify this impression. How to cite this article Jeanet J, Benjamin SJ, Mathews JE, Rathore S, Sebastian A, Thomas E. Intrapartum Amniotic Fluid Volume Estimation in Low-risk Pregnancy as a Predictor of Perinatal Outcome. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2014;6(3):156-158.

Curve of amniotic fluid index measurements in low-risk pregnancy

2007 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Regina Machado ◽  
Jose Guilherme Cecatti ◽  
Fabiana Krupa ◽  
Anibal Faundes
Keyword(s):  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Low Risk Pregnancy

scholarly journals Pregnancy outcome in low risk pregnancy with decreased amniotic fluid index

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 887
Author(s):  
Swathi Bhat ◽  
Ambika H. E. ◽  
Lepakshi B. G. ◽  
Savitha C. S.
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Term Pregnancy ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
High Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Low Risk Pregnancy

Background: To evaluate whether oligohydramnios (AFI≤5) has any significance in the outcome of low risk pregnancies. Normal amniotic fluid index in pregnancy is one of the indicators of fetal well-being.  In a term pregnancy, oligohydramnios, a condition associated with AFI≤5, could be a sign of placental insufficiency. An association of low AFI with complications like pregnancy induced hypertension, consistently leads to poor fetal outcome. A need to deliver the fetus by cesarean section often arises. Occasionally one comes across a full-term pregnancy with AFI ≤5 with no known high risk factors; this could lead to increased cesarean section rates. Thus, it becomes necessary to evaluate if AFI ≤5 in the absence of other risk factors has any significance on obstetric outcome.Methods: Prospective case controlled study was done. Fifty women with term pregnancies and (AFI≤5) cm not associated with any other high risk factors were enrolled for the study. They were matched with fifty controls with normal AFI.Results: Except for a slight increase in variable deceleration in the study group, no differences were noted with fetal heart rate recordings in NST.  Decreased AFI was not associated with increased cesarean section rates, instrumental deliveries or meconium stained amniotic fluid. Severe asphyxia, NICU admission or perinatal mortality was not noted in either group.Conclusions: When a low risk pregnancy is associated with Oligohydramnios (AFI≤5), it does not have any deleterious effect on labor outcome or perinatal outcome.

scholarly journals Biophysical profile and modified biophysical profile in predicting the fetal outcome

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3516
Author(s):  
V. G. Vanamala ◽  
Aruna Rachel ◽  
Sushil Pakyanadhan ◽  
Sudheep Abraham P.
Keyword(s):  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Heart Beat ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Index ◽  
Uterine Contractions ◽  
Beat Pattern ◽  
Biophysical Profile ◽  
Fetal Movements

Background: Baby’s well-being in utero is often done by using a cardiotocograph (CTG) machine, which assesses the baby’s heart beat pattern as well as the mother’s uterine contractions. However, lowered fetal movements sometimes may be fatal for the baby. Thus, the biophysical and the modified biophysical profile have been introduced.Methods: 242 patients with over 34 weeks of gestation and with one or more risk factors were included in the study. After taking the demographic details, the patients were subjected to detailed physical and clinical evaluation. Modified BPP was done on all the patients. Index of acute fetal hypoxia the NST was done along with the cardiotocograph (CTG). Amniotic fluid volume was calculated.Results: According to the fetal non-stress test, majority of the patients (70.7%) were reactive while 29.3% were non-reactive. Most of the patients had an amniotic fluid index in the normal range i.e. between 8 -<25, 18.6%) had an AFI value of <6 cm while 13.6% had between 6 - <8. Among the babies with reactive NST, non-reactive NST and AFI ≤5, the most common outcome was low birth weight.  APGAR score <7 was observed in 11.1%, 13.1%, 20% among Reactive NST, Non-reactive NST and AFI ≤5 respectively.Conclusions: Present study shows that BPP and MBPP are both comparable to each other, therefore, MBPP, being an easier test can be substituted for BPP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document