A number of recent voices in contemporary political and legal philosophy have suggested that something is wrong with international humanitarian relief and human rights advocacy. Such a critique no longer seems to be motivated by ideologies of Social Darwinism or by beliefs in the unconditional primacy of araison d'Étatover the needs and rights of individuals. Rather, it derives from a perspective that sees humanitarian activism as an ill-conceived, often merely compensatory gesture.
A Study of Acceptance of Kato Hiroyuki's Social Darwinism and The Korean translations: With The new theory of human rights and The theory of A Strong's right of competition