scholarly journals Predator nonconsumptive effects on prey recruitment weaken with recruit density

Ecology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius A. Ellrich ◽  
Ricardo A. Scrosati ◽  
Markus Molis
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-558
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Koch ◽  
Robert O. Hall ◽  
Barbara L. Peckarsky

Ecology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Heckel ◽  
Norman A. Bourg ◽  
William J. McShea ◽  
Susan Kalisz

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 680-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Clark ◽  
Paul A. Moore

The impact of nonconsumptive effects (NCEs) in structuring predator–prey interactions and trophic cascades is a prominent area of ecological research. For NCEs to occur, prey need to be able to detect the presence of predators through sensory mechanisms. The investigation of the role of different sensory modalities in predator detection has lagged behind the development of NCE-based theories. This study aimed to determine whether a hierarchy in the reliance upon sensory modalities exists in the rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus (Girard, 1852) = Faxonius rusticus (Girard, 1852)) for predator detection and if this hierarchy is altered across different sensory environments (flowing and nonflowing environments). Rusty crayfish were exposed to largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides (Lacépède, 1802)) odor in either a flowing or nonflowing arena where behavior was recorded under different sensory lesions. Linear mixed models were conducted to determine the impact of lesions, flowing environments, and the interactive effects of lesions and flowing environments on the rusty crayfish ability to respond to predatory stimuli. Results from this study support the significance of sensory multimodality in the rusty crayfish for accurately detecting and assessing predatory threats. Results from this study also suggest a hierarchy in the reliance upon sensory modalities in the rusty crayfish that is dependent upon the environment and the location of rusty crayfish within an environment.


Ecology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C. Donelan ◽  
Jonathan H. Grabowski ◽  
Geoffrey C. Trussell

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1398-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Michaud ◽  
Paulo R. R. Barbosa ◽  
Clint L. Bain ◽  
Jorge B. Torres

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley R. Johnston ◽  
Markus Molis ◽  
Ricardo A. Scrosati

Nonconsumptive predator effects on prey behaviour are common in nature, but the possible influence of prey life-history stage on such responses is poorly known. We investigated whether prey life-history stage may be a factor affecting prey feeding activity responses to predator chemical cues, for which we used dogwhelks ( Nucella lapillus (L., 1758)) and their main prey, barnacles ( Semibalanus balanoides (L., 1758)), as a model system. Barnacles use their modified legs (cirri) to filter food from the water column. Through a manipulative laboratory experiment, we tested the hypothesis that the presence of dogwhelks affects the frequency of leg swipes differently in juvenile and adult barnacles. Juveniles showed a similar feeding activity with and without nearby dogwhelks, but adults exhibited a significantly lower frequency of leg swipes when dogwhelks were present. Such an ontogenetic change in the response of barnacles to predatory cues might have evolved as a result of dogwhelks preferring adult barnacles over juvenile barnacles, as found previously. Alternatively, barnacles could learn to recognize predator cues as they age, as shown for other prey species. Overall, our study indicates that the nonconsumptive effects of predators on prey need to be fully understood under consideration of the possible ontogenetic changes in prey responses to predator cues.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (16) ◽  
pp. 9324-9333
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Mohlman ◽  
Rachel R. Gardner ◽  
I. B. Parnell ◽  
Nathan G. Wilhite ◽  
James A. Martin

Ecology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 549-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Wissinger ◽  
Howard H. Whiteman ◽  
Mathieu Denoël ◽  
Miranda L. Mumford ◽  
Catherine B. Aubee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document