Reliability of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS), and ultrasonographic classification of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules

Objective: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Methods: We performed a computerized search of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify eligible articles published before July 31, 2019. We included studies providing head-to-head comparison between ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines, with fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology results or pathology results as the reference standard. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2 tool. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling. We also performed multiple subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results: Twelve original articles with 13,000 patients were included, involving a total of 14,867 thyroid nodules. The pooled sensitivity of ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80–0.95), with specificity of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56–0.76) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29–0.63), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two classification criteria in terms of both sensitivity ( P = .26) and specificity ( P = .05). For five studies providing direct comparison of ACR TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, and Korean TI-RADS, our analyses showed that the Korean TI-RADS yielded the highest sensitivity (0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.94), but at the cost of a significant decline in specificity (0.23; 95% CI, 0.17–0.30). Conclusion: Both classification criteria demonstrated favorable sensitivity and moderate specificity in the stratification of thyroid nodules. However, use of ACR TI-RADS could avoid a large number of biopsies at the cost of only a slight decrease in sensitivity. Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; HSROC = hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic; SROC = summary receiver operating characteristic; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; US = ultrasonography

Download Full-text

USING THE ATA AND ACR TI-RADS SONOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATIONS AS ADJUNCTIVE PREDICTORS OF MALIGNANCY FOR INDETERMINATE THYROID NODULES

Endocrine Practice ◽

10.4158/ep-2018-0559 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 25 (9) ◽

pp. 908-917 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Sara Ahmadi ◽

Rebecca Herbst ◽

Taofik Oyekunle ◽

Xiaoyin ‘Sara’ Jiang ◽

Kyle Strickland ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ultrasound Imaging ◽

Thyroid Nodules ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Data System ◽

Follicular Neoplasm ◽

American Thyroid Association ◽

Thyroid Imaging ◽

Risk Of Malignancy ◽

Indeterminate Cytology ◽

Undetermined Significance

Objective: Thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology pose management challenges in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound features in navigating clinical decision making in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound imaging from 186 adult patients with thyroid nodules and indeterminate cytology who underwent thyroidectomy at a quaternary hospital from 2010–2017. All nodules were classified based on the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and 2017 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS). Nodules were included if good quality pre-operative ultrasound imaging and surgical pathology were available. Results: A total of 202 thyroid nodules were included. The median age was 57 years; 82.8% were female. Risk of malignancy (ROM) in resected nodules with Bethesda 3 and 4 cytology was 19.4% and 30.3%, respectively. ATA high-suspicious and TI-RADS 5 nodules had high ROM, 100% in both systems for Bethesda 3 nodules; 66.7% and 50.0%, respectively, for Bethesda 4 nodules. For ATA very-low suspicious/TI-RADS 1 and 2, ROM was 0%. ROM in ATA low-suspicious/TI-RADS 3 nodules with Bethesda 3 cytology was lower (15.2% and 16.0%, respectively) than Bethesda 4 cytology (33.8% and 34.3%, respectively). ATA intermediate-suspicious/TI-RADS 4 nodules with Bethesda 4 cytology had a lower ROM (11.1% and 18.2%, respectively) than Bethesda 3 cytology (28.6 % and 31.6%, respectively). Conclusion: Using either the ATA or the TI-RADS system to risk-stratify nodules with indeterminate cytology may help clinicians plan better for additional diagnostic testing and treatment. Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; AUS = atypia of undetermined significance; FLUS = follicular lesion of undetermined significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; PPV = positive predictive value; ROM = risk of malignancy; SFN = suspicious for follicular neoplasm; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System

Download Full-text

CAN THE AMERICAN THYROID ASSOCIATION, K-TIRADS, AND ACR-TIRADS ULTRASOUND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS BE USED TO PREDICT MALIGNANCY IN BETHESDA CATEGORY IV NODULES?

Endocrine Practice ◽

10.4158/ep-2020-0024 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 26 (9) ◽

pp. 945-952 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Wei Yang ◽

Ghaneh Fananapazir ◽

Jennifer LaRoy ◽

Machelle Wilson ◽

Michael J. Campbell

Keyword(s):

Predictive Value ◽

Thyroid Nodules ◽

Needle Aspiration ◽

Classification Systems ◽

Data System ◽

Risk Category ◽

American Thyroid Association ◽

Thyroid Imaging ◽

Grading Systems ◽

Risk Of Malignancy

Objective: Management of thyroid nodules with Bethesda category III and IV cytology on fine needle aspiration (FNA) is challenging as they cannot be adequately classified as benign or malignant. Ultrasound (US) patterns have demonstrated the utility in evaluating the risk of malignancy (ROM) of Bethesda category III nodules. This study aims to evaluate the value of 3 well-established US grading systems (American Thyroid Association [ATA], Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [Korean-TIRADS], and The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System [ACR-TIRADS]) in determining ROM in Bethesda category IV nodules. Methods: Ninety-two patients with 92 surgically resected thyroid nodules who had Bethesda category IV cytology on FNA were identified. Nodule images were retrospectively graded using the 3 systems in a blinded manner. Associations between US risk category and malignant pathology for each system were analyzed. Results: Of the 92 nodules, 56 (61%) were benign and 36 (39%) were malignant. Forty-seven per cent of ATA high risk nodules, 53% of K-TIRADS category 5 nodules, and 50% of ACR-TIRADS category 5 nodules were malignant. The ATA high-risk category had 25% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 47% positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy. K-TIRADS category 5 had 25% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 53% PPV for malignancy. ACR-TIRADS category 5 had 25% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 50% PPV for malignancy. None of the 3 grading systems yielded a statistically significant correlation between US risk category and the ROM ( P = .30, .72, .28). Conclusion: The ATA, Korean-TIRADS, and ACR-TIRADS classification systems are not helpful in stratifying ROM in patients with Bethesda category IV nodules. Clinicians should be cautious of using ultra-sound alone when deciding between therapeutic options for patients with Bethesda category IV thyroid nodules. Abbreviations: ACR-TIRADS = The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; ATA NSP = American Thyroid Association nodule sonographic patterns and risk of malignancy classification system; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNA = fine needle aspiration; FTC = follicular thyroid carcinoma; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; HCC = Hurthle cell carcinoma; HCN = Hurthle cell neoplasm; K-TIRADS = Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; ROM = risk of malignancy; US = ultrasound

Download Full-text

Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Comparison between the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and the 2014 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines

Radiology ◽

10.1148/radiol.2015150056 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 278 (3) ◽

pp. 917-924 ◽

Cited By ~ 115

Author(s):

Jung Hyun Yoon ◽

Hye Sun Lee ◽

Eun-Kyung Kim ◽

Hee Jung Moon ◽

Jin Young Kwak

Keyword(s):

Risk Stratification ◽

Thyroid Nodules ◽

Data System ◽

American Thyroid Association ◽

Management Guidelines ◽

Malignancy Risk ◽

Thyroid Imaging ◽

Association Management

Download Full-text

GUIDELINE IMPLEMENTATION ON FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION FOR THYROID NODULES: FOCUSING ON MICRONODULES

Endocrine Practice ◽

10.4158/ep-2020-0163 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 26 (9) ◽

pp. 1017-1025

Author(s):

Si Eun Lee ◽

Eun-Kyung Kim ◽

Hee Jung Moon ◽

Jung Hyun Yoon ◽

Vivian Youngjean Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Thyroid Nodule ◽

Fine Needle Aspiration ◽

Thyroid Surgery ◽

Thyroid Nodules ◽

Guideline Implementation ◽

Needle Aspiration ◽

Data System ◽

American Thyroid Association ◽

Fine Needle ◽

Thyroid Imaging

Objective: We investigated patients who were referred to our institution after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed at outside clinics to evaluate how many nodules satisfied the FNA indications of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and compare that to the number of thyroid nodules that satisfy the FNA indications of the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines. Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2018, 2,628 patients were included in our study. The included patients were those referred for thyroid surgery after having a suspicious thyroid nodule. We retrospectively applied the three guidelines to each thyroid nodule and determined whether each nodule satisfied the FNA indications. We compared the proportion of nodules satisfying the FNA indications of each guideline using a generalized linear model and generalized estimating equation. Results: The median size of the 2,628 thyroid nodules was 0.9 cm (range, 0.2 to 9.5 cm). We found that FNA was not indicated for 54.1%, 47.7%, and 19.1% of nodules and 87.3%, 99.0%, and 97.8% among them were micronodules (<1 cm) according to the ACR-TIRADS, ATA guideline, and K-TIRADS, respectively. The proportion of micronodules which satisfied the FNA indications was significantly higher for the K-TIRADS (65.1%) compared to the ACR TIRADS (12.1%) and ATA guideline (12.1%) ( P<.001). Conclusion: Among patients referred for thyroid surgery to our institutions, about 35% of the micronodules underwent FNA despite not being appropriate for indications by the K-TIRADS. Systematic training for physicians as well as modifications to increase the sensitivity of the guideline may be needed to reduce the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancers, especially for micronodules. Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; K-TIRADS = Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; LN = lymph node; TIRADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; US = ultrasound

Download Full-text

The Diagnostic Efficacy of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine ◽

10.1155/2022/9995962 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 2022 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Fei Chen ◽

Yungang Sun ◽

Guanqi Chen ◽

Yuqian Luo ◽

Guifang Xue ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Stratification ◽

Thyroid Nodules ◽

Data System ◽

Receiver Operating Curve ◽

American Thyroid Association ◽

Diagnostic Efficacy ◽

Thyroid Imaging ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Stratification System ◽

Receiver Operating

Background. This study is aimed at evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound-based risk stratification for thyroid nodules in the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification systems. Methods. 286 patients with thyroid cancer were included in the tumor group, with 259 nontumor cases included in the nontumor group. The ACR TI-RADS and ATA risk stratification systems assessed all thyroid nodules for malignant risks. The diagnostic effect of ACR and ATA risk stratification system for thyroid nodules was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis using postoperative pathological diagnosis as the gold standard. Results. The distributions and mean scores of ACR and ATA rating risk stratification were significantly different between the tumor and nontumor groups. The lesion diameter > 1 cm subgroup had higher malignant ultrasound feature rates detected and ACR and ATA scores. A significant difference was not found in the ACR and ATA scores between patients with or without Hashimoto’s disease. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the ACR TI-RADS and the ATA systems was 0.891 and 0.896, respectively. The ACR had better specificity (0.90) while the ATA system had higher sensitivity (0.92), with both scenarios having almost the same overall diagnostic accuracy (0.84). Conclusion. Both the ACR TI-RADS and the ATA risk stratification systems provide a clinically feasible thyroid malignant risk classification, with high thyroid nodule malignant risk diagnostic efficacy.

Download Full-text