scholarly journals The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors proposal for sharing clinical trial data and the possible implications for the peer review process

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 115-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Kavsak
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

scholarly journals Editorial-Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W De Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 387 (10016) ◽  
pp. e9-e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

scholarly journals Sharing Clinical Trial Data — A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

2016 ◽  
Vol 374 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B. Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W. de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
DarrenB Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
PeterW de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal From the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

2016 ◽  
Vol 164 (7) ◽  
pp. 505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B. Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W. de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

scholarly journals Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

scholarly journals Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e1001950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B. Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W. de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

scholarly journals Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

2016 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-92
Author(s):  
Darren B. Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W. de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

scholarly journals THE LIMITED EFFECTIVENESS OF PRESTIGE AS AN INTERVENTION ON THE HEALTH OF MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS

Episteme ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole J. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Academic Medicine ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Dual Role ◽  
Traditional System ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Limited Effectiveness

AbstractUnder the traditional system of peer-reviewed publication, the degree of prestige conferred to authors by successful publication is tied to the degree of the intellectual rigor of its peer review process: ambitious scientists do well professionally by doing well epistemically. As a result, we should expect journal editors, in their dual role as epistemic evaluators and prestige-allocators, to have the power to motivate improved author behavior through the tightening of publication requirements. Contrary to this expectation, I will argue that the publication bias literature in academic medicine demonstrates that editor interventions have had limited effectiveness in improving the health of the publication and trial registration record, suggesting that much stronger interventions are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document