scholarly journals Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 115-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuyong Tan ◽  
Linna Tan ◽  
Jiaxi Lu ◽  
Jirong Huo ◽  
Deliang Liu
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cicilia Marcella ◽  
Rui Hua Shi ◽  
Shakeel Sarwar

Aims. To review the clinical presentation, diagnosis, assessment of risk of malignancy, and recent advances in management (mainly focusing on the role of endoscopic resection) of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in upper GI.Method. We searched Embase, Web of science, and PubMed databases from 1993 to 2018 by using the following keywords: “gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” “GIST,” “treatment,” and “diagnosis.” Additional papers were searched manually from references of the related articles.Findings. The improvement of endoscopic techniques in treating upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors especially gastrointestinal tumors has reduced the need for invasive surgery in patients unfit for surgery. Many studies have concluded that modified endoscopic treatments are effective and safe. These treatments permit minimal tissue resection, better dissection control, and high rates of en bloc resection with an acceptable rate of complications.


2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-727
Author(s):  
Mi-Young Kim ◽  
Kee Don Choi ◽  
Jeong Hoon Lee ◽  
Hye-won Park ◽  
Do Hoon Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (08) ◽  
pp. E950-E956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiyi Song ◽  
Wei Ren ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Shu Zhang ◽  
Song Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Up to the present time, complete surgical excision has been the standard treatment for primary GISTs greater than 2 cm. It is well known that tumor rupture during surgery is an independent risk factor for peritoneal metastasis; however, it is not known whether the risk of peritoneal metastasis increases in cases where the tumor is ruptured during endoscopic resection. Patients and methods A total of 195 patients treated for GIST between January 2014 and December 2016 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups according to whether the tumor was ruptured during endoscopic resection. The rate of peritoneal metastasis in patients in the two groups who also suffered perforation was investigated from the follow-up results. Results Approximately 55.4 % of all patients were female and the average age of the study group was 59.0 ± 10.3 years. Of the 195 patients, the tumors in 27 were ruptured and the remaining 168 patients underwent en bloc resection. There was no statistically significant difference in gender or age between the two groups. The median tumor size (maximum diameter) in all patients was 1.5 cm (0.3 – 5.0 cm): 2.5 cm (0.8 – 5.0 cm) and 1.4 cm (0.3 – 4.0 cm) in the tumor rupture group and en bloc resection group, respectively (P < 0.001). Most of the tumors were located in the gastric fundus. At a median follow-up of 18.7 ± 10.2 months, neither tumor recurrence (liver metastasis, peritoneal metastasis, local recurrence) nor mortality related to GISTs were detected. Conclusions Tumor rupture during endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs may not be a risk factor for peritoneal metastasis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB256-AB257
Author(s):  
Amaninder J. Dhaliwal ◽  
Harmeet S. Mashiana ◽  
Ajay Pal Singh ◽  
Banreet S. Dhindsa ◽  
Aravdeep Jhand ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 5149-5157
Author(s):  
Jian-Wei Mi ◽  
Jia-Qi Wang ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Li-Xian Zhang ◽  
Hong-Wei Du ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Piccinni ◽  
Andrea Marzullo ◽  
Anna Angrisano ◽  
Donatello Iacobone ◽  
Michele Nacchiero

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document