scholarly journals Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: alpha-fetoprotein should be included in selection criteria

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 103-103
Author(s):  
Hans-Christian Pommergaard
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-515
Author(s):  
Markus Bo Schoenberg ◽  
Hubertus Johann Wolfgang Anger ◽  
Julian Nikolaus Bucher ◽  
Gerald Denk ◽  
Enrico Narciso De Toni ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Current practice to only prioritize hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that fulfill the Milan criteria (IN<sub>MC</sub>) is changing, since it causes the exclusion of patients who could benefit from liver transplantation. To select patients outside MC (OUT<sub>MC</sub>) for transplantation, we implemented extended selection criteria without up-front morphometric restrictions containing surrogate parameters of tumor biology. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> OUT<sub>MC</sub> patients were considered without restrictions of morphometrics and received locoregional treatment after interdisciplinary consultation. Our dynamic selection criteria for OUT<sub>MC</sub> patients required (IN<sub>MUC</sub>): (1) treatment response over (2) at least 6 months and (3) alpha-fetoprotein ≤400 ng/mL over the entire evaluation period. Patients with IN<sub>MC</sub> tumors served as control and internal validation cohort. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 31 of 170 liver transplant candidates were OUT<sub>MC</sub>. Of these, 8 dropped out. The remaining 23 patients met the selection criteria and underwent transplantation. Recurrence-free survival was higher in patients transplanted IN<sub>MC</sub> compared to those OUT<sub>MC</sub> IN<sub>MUC</sub> (92.2% vs. 70.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.026) after 5 years of follow-up. Overall survival showed no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.552). With dynamic selection of transplant candidates, recurrence could also be predicted for the IN<sub>MC</sub> patients as internal validation cohort (c-index: 0.896; CI 0.588–0.981, <i>p</i> = 0.005). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Dynamic selection criteria for the stratification of patients with OUT<sub>MC</sub> HCCs is feasible and allows for excellent long-term results and acceptable tumor recurrence rates comparable to IN<sub>MC</sub> patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Sang Jin Kim ◽  
Jong Man Kim

Traditionally, liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis is not recommended. However, with recent developments in locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, more aggressive treatments have been attempted for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, various studies on locoregional therapies for downstaging followed by living donor liver transplantation reported inspiring overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients. These downstaging procedures included three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, trans-arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiation therapy, trans-arterial radioembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and combinations of these therapies. Selection of the optimal downstaging protocol should depend on tumor location, biology and background liver status. The risk factors affecting outcome include pre-downstaging alpha-fetoprotein values, delta alpha-fetoprotein values, disappearance of portal vein tumor thrombosis on imaging and meeting the Milan criteria or not after downstaging. For hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis, downstaging procedure with liver transplantation in mind would be helpful. If the reaction of the downstaged tumor is good, liver transplantation may be performed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1144-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ah Yeong Kim ◽  
Dong Hyun Sinn ◽  
Woo Kyoung Jeong ◽  
Young Kon Kim ◽  
Tae Wook Kang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document