scholarly journals A Hybrid Technique to Treat Inguinal Wound Infection after Arterial Surgery with Lateral Femoral Bypass and Intra-Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Fan Wu ◽  
Dong Zhang ◽  
Ai-Xi Yu ◽  
Baiwen Qi ◽  
Chao Jian
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Imaging Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Challenge ◽  
Vascular Bypass ◽  
Radical Debridement ◽  
Staged Treatment

Abstract Background: Patients with the inguinal wound infection after arterial surgery remains clinical challenge. Sustaining lymphatic leakage have been shown as a common and potentially serious complication. However, it remains clinical challenge for surgery to deal with this tough problem. Methods: This study describes a hybrid technique of using radical debridement, lateral femoral bypass (LFB) and intra-incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) for single-staged treatment of complex inguinal wound infection after arterial surgery (IWI-AS).Results: Between January 2017 and June 2021, 5 IWI-AS cases treated with this new method were identified. Of the patients, 3 were males and 2 were females. The average age was 49.4 years (range, 33 to 77 years). 4 cases suffered emergent operations due to the sudden bleedings. after vascular bypass reconstructions and an average of 2.2 (range:1-3) iNWPT, all cases achieved wound healing at an average duration of 4.6 weeks (range: 3-6weeks). Moreover, all cases showed no bacterial growth and grafts patency as indicated by doppler ultrasound or CT angiography postoperatively. One case did not receive bypass imaging evaluation at postoperative 12 months. Weakness of quadriceps femoris was observed in one case. Conclusion: single-staged therapy of LFB and iNPWT hybridization is a technically handy and effective method for treatment of inguinal wound infection after arterial surgery.

scholarly journals A Hybrid Technique to Treat Inguinal wound Infection after Arterial Surgery with Lateral Femoral Bypass and Intra-incisional Negative Pressure wound Therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Fan Wu ◽  
Dong Zhang ◽  
Ai-Xi Yu ◽  
Baiwen Qi ◽  
Chao Jian
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Imaging Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Challenge ◽  
Vascular Bypass ◽  
Radical Debridement ◽  
Staged Treatment

Abstract Background: Patients with the inguinal wound infection after arterial surgery remains clinical challenge. Sustaining lymphatic leakage have been shown as a common and potentially serious complication. However, it remains clinical challenge for surgery to deal with this tough problem. Methods: This study describes a hybrid technique of using radical debridement, lateral femoral bypass (LFB) and intra-incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) for single-staged treatment of complex inguinal wound infection after arterial surgery (IWI-AS).Results: Between January 2017 and June 2021, 5 IWI-AS cases treated with this new method were identified. Of the patients, 3 were males and 2 were females. The average age was 49.4 years (range, 33 to 77 years). 4 cases suffered emergent operations due to the sudden bleedings. after vascular bypass reconstructions and an average of 2.2 (range:1-3) iNWPT, all cases achieved wound healing at an average duration of 4.6 weeks (range: 3-6weeks). Moreover, all cases showed no bacterial growth and grafts patency as indicated by doppler ultrasound or CT angiography postoperatively. One case did not receive bypass imaging evaluation at postoperative 12 months. Weakness of quadriceps femoris was observed in one case. Conclusion: single-staged therapy of LFB and iNPWT hybridization is a technically handy and effective method for treatment of inguinal wound infection after arterial surgery.

Negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressing for open fractures in lower extremity trauma

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (7) ◽  
pp. 912-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Tahir ◽  
Ejaz A. Chaudhry ◽  
Faridullah K. Zimri ◽  
Nadeem Ahmed ◽  
Saeed A. Shaikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Open Fractures ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Gauze Dressing ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Aims It has been generally accepted that open fractures require early skeletal stabilization and soft-tissue reconstruction. Traditionally, a standard gauze dressing was applied to open wounds. There has been a recent shift in this paradigm towards negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with open tibial fractures receiving standard dressing versus NPWT. Methods This multicentre randomized controlled trial was approved by the ethical review board of a public sector tertiary care institute. Wounds were graded using Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification, and patients with GA-II to III-C were included in the study. To be eligible, the patient had to present within 72 hours of the injury. The primary outcome of the study was patient-reported Disability Rating Index (DRI) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included quality of life assessment using 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12), wound infection rates at six weeks and nonunion rates at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis and independent-samples t-test were applied for secondary outcomes. Analyses of primary and secondary outcomes were performed using SPSS v. 22.0.1 and p-values of < 0.05 were considered significant. Results A total of 486 patients were randomized between January 2016 and December 2018. Overall 206 (49.04%) patients underwent NPWT, while 214 (50.95%) patients were allocated to the standard dressing group. There was no statistically significant difference in DRI at 12 months between NPWT and standard dressing groups (mean difference 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.08 to 1.1; p = 0.581). Regarding SF-12 scores at 12 months follow-up, there was no significant difference at any point from injury until 12 months (mean difference 1.4; 95% CI 0.7 to 1.9; p = 0.781). The 30-day deep infection rate was slightly higher in the standard gauze dressing group. The non-union odds were also comparable (odds ratio (OR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.45; p = 0.685). Conclusion Our study concludes that NPWT therapy does not confer benefit over standard dressing technique for open fractures. The DRI, SF-12 scores, wound infection, and nonunion rates were analogous in both study groups. We suggest surgeons continue to use cheaper and more readily available standard dressings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):912–917.

scholarly journals Combination of Side-Swing Flap With Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Is Superior to Open Excision or Flap Alone in Children With Pilonidal Sinus—But at What Cost?

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Dorth ◽  
Ingo Königs ◽  
Julia Elrod ◽  
Tarik Ghadban ◽  
Konrad Reinshagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
The Right ◽  
Open Excision

Background: Pilonidal sinus (PS) disease frequently occurs in adolescents and young adults, and in many cases involves wide excision or local flaps as treatment. These treatments are associated with a significant recurrence rate, a long healing time, and thus absence from school or work. The hybrid technique, which is a combination of side-swing plasty with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) may improve these outcomes. The aim of the study was to compare the latter with other current methods.Methods: Children presenting with a pilonidal sinus to two referral centers for pediatric surgery from January 2017 till June 2019 and subsequent (1) slide-swing plasty, (2) open excision, or (3) slide-swing plasty in combination with NPWT were included in this retrospective study. Type of therapy, number of interventions, duration of hospitalization, complications, and recurrence rate were recorded. In addition, data was retrieved from the national diagnosis-related group for inpatient statistics, for all patients who underwent surgery for pilonidal sinus in 2015 and 2016.Results: In total, 85 children were included, with a mean age of 15 years and a near equal gender distribution (53% female). The minimum follow-up was 1 year. In 56% open resection was performed, while 18% underwent a slide-swing plasty and 26% a slide-swing plasty in combination with NPWT. While the hybrid technique was superior regarding recurrence rate in comparison to open excision (24 vs. 5%, p = 0.047), it had significantly longer hospital stay [17.41 (15.63) vs. 3.65 (1.68) days, p &lt; 0.001] and number of interventions [4.14 (4.07) vs. 1.04 (0.29), p &lt; 0.001].Conclusions: Management of PS disease using slide-swing plasty in combination with NPWT is an effective treatment and is associated with low recurrence rate and minimal morbidity. However, this type of treatment is accompanied by an elongated hospitalization time and more frequent interventions. A diligent case by case evaluation and thorough patient counseling is thus necessary when choosing the right technique for the treatment of PS disease.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Poststernotomy Deep Sternal Wound Infection

2016 ◽  
pp. 41-73
Author(s):  
Christian Willy ◽  
Catharina Scheuermann-Poley ◽  
Marcus Stichling ◽  
Onnen Grauhan ◽  
André Lieber
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Deep Sternal Wound Infection ◽  
Sternal Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Therapy

scholarly journals Decreasing complications of pectoralis major muscle flap reconstruction with two modalities of negative pressure wound therapy

2021 ◽  
pp. 145749692110433
Author(s):  
Heidi-Mari Myllykangas ◽  
Jari Halonen ◽  
Annastiina Husso ◽  
Leena T. Berg
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Pectoralis Major Muscle ◽  
Muscle Flap ◽  
Pectoralis Major ◽  
Deep Sternal Wound Infection ◽  
Sternal Wound Infection ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Pectoralis Major Muscle Flap

Background and objective: Deep sternal wound infection is a feared complication of open-heart surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy has gained an important role in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy has been introduced as a method to prevent wound complications after sternotomy, and lately, after flap reconstructions in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection. We aimed to study if incisional negative pressure wound therapy with PICO™ had similar beneficial effect described earlier with competing commercial devices. Methods: This study included 82 patients treated with pectoralis major muscle flap for deep sternal wound infection during the years 2006–2020. PICO group consisted of 24 patients treated with preoperative negative pressure wound therapy and postoperative incisional negative pressure wound therapy (PICO™). Two control groups included 48 patients with conventional treatment and 10 patients with preoperative negative pressure wound therapy only. Results: In the PICO group, the complication rate declined from 50.0% to 33.30%, major complication rate from 29.2% to 12.5%, and need for an additional flap from 14.6.% to 4.2% when compared to conventional treatment. The length of hospital stay decreased as well. Preoperative negative pressure wound therapy alone was associated with moderate decline in the complication rates. In addition, we described the use of split pectoralis major muscle flap reconstruction in 57 patients. To our knowledge, this is the largest published patient series describing this method in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection. Conclusions: Incisional negative pressure wound therapy with PICO™ seems beneficial after flap reconstruction. Split pectoralis major muscle flap is a versatile reconstruction option suitable to be used as a workhorse in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection.

Negative pressure wound therapy—two novel approaches to healing dehisced vascular bypass wounds

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 449-453
Author(s):  
Paula O'Malley ◽  
Ciaran McDonnell
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Secondary Intention ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Vascular Bypass ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Therapeutic Pressure ◽  
Flap Closure

The use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in surgical wound healing by secondary intention is well known. Its use in healing dehisced vascular bypass wounds is contraindicated by manufacturers due to exposed vasculature and risk of bleeding. There is an increasing body of knowledge to support the use of NPWT in vascular wounds in order to prevent graft excision and the need for flap closure. This paper reports the use of two different approaches using NPWT to heal dehisced, infected vascular groin bypass wounds in two patients. Both patients had lower limb bypass using Dacron (Vascutek Ltd., UK) grafts and subsequently became infected, dehisced and required debridement. Following debridement, graft was visible in the wound bed and NPWT was applied to facilitate healing. Case one had polyurethane (black) foam and a layer of petroleum-impregnated cellulose acetate mesh to prevent adherence to the graft. Case two had polyvinyl alcohol (white) (PVA) foam applied to the wound. The PVA foam was used in Case two due to pain at dressing changes. Negative pressure was initially –25mmHg but increased gradually to –125mmHg and –150mmHg, respectively, the therapeutic pressure for the respective foams. Dressings were changed every 48–72 hours and infection treated with antibiotics as appropriate. After eight days and 28 days of NPWT, respectively, graft was no longer visible. No significant bleeding was noted. These two case studies would suggest that, with precautions taken to protect the vasculature, the use of NPWT in healing dehisced vascular groin wounds is an appropriate treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document