scholarly journals Evaluation of Ellipsoid Zone Changes in Different Types of Diabetic Macular Edema After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Utku Limon ◽  
Betul Ilkay Sezgin Akcay
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Ellipsoid Zone ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Bevacizumab Injection

Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the ellipsoid zone (EZ) changes according to the types of diabetic macular edema (DME) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) after intravitreal bevacizumab injection. Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of the patients who had treatment-naive DME and underwent intravitreal bevacizumab treatment between January 2015 and December 2021 were analyzed. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and completed the follow-up period of 12 months were divided into 4 groups according to the types of diabetic macular edema on OCT (Diffuse DME [Group-1], cystoid DME [Group-2], diffuse DME with serous retinal detachment (SRD) [Group-3] and cystoid DME with SRD [Group-4]). Primary outcomes were EZ changes between the groups.Results: 125 eyes of 96 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed the follow-up period were included in the study. There were no statistically significant differences in EZ improvements between the groups at 4, 6 and 12 months after treatment (p =0,594, p=0,836, p=0,486, p=0,748 respectively). The mean logMAR BCVA and CMT of all eyes showed significant improvement at 4, 6 and 12 months. When the mean CMT was compared between each groups, there were significant differences between the Group-1and Group-4 at 4, 6 and 12 months after treatment. (p<0,05)Conclusion: The BCVA gains and improvement in the CMT were maintained in all four DME types during the first year of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy. The improvement in EZ disruption was not depent on the type of DME and improved similarly in all groups.

Correlation of response to intravitreal bevacizumab treatment between the first and second treated eyes in diabetic macular edema

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110596
Author(s):  
Nadav Levinger ◽  
Liran Tiosano ◽  
Elishai Assayag ◽  
Rivkah Lender ◽  
Tomer Batash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Thickness Reduction ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
Central Subfield Thickness ◽  
Bilateral Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Selection Of

Purpose To evaluate whether outcome of bevacizumab treatment in the first treated eye can guide the selection of compound for the second treated eye in patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema. Methods Demographic, clinical, and optical coherence tomography data were retrospectively collected from consecutive patients who underwent bevacizumab therapy for bilateral diabetic macular edema. Change in central subfield thickness and visual acuity were evaluated and compared between the first treated eye and second treated eye. Results A total of 66 eyes of 33 patients were included in the study. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 13 ± 5 months. The mean ± SD central subfield thickness at baseline was 464 ± 30 μm in the first treated eye and 461 ± 29 μm in the second treated eye ( p = 0.91). Final central subfield thickness was reduced to 392 ± 27 μm in the first treated eye ( p = 0.01 compared with baseline) and 416 ± 25 μm in the second treated eye ( p = 0.03 compared with baseline). Using ≥5% or ≥10% reduction of central subfield thickness as diagnostic criteria to predict similar magnitude of thickness reduction in the first treated eye yielded a positive and negative predictive value ranging from 46% to 81%, and sensitivity and specificity ranging from 54% to 84%. Regression models did not show correlation between central subfield thickness reduction in first treated eye and the second treated eye at the end of follow-up. Conclusions Bevacizumab therapy reduced macular thickness in both eyes in bilateral diabetic macular edema. Treatment outcome of the first treated eye could not predict the outcome of the second treated eye. Particularly, failure to reduce central subfield thickness in the first treated eye does not preclude a favorable response to bevacizumab therapy in the second eye.

scholarly journals Combined Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Laser Photocoagulation to Treat Retinal Arterial Macroaneurysms

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1053-1060
Author(s):  
Tae Hoon Kim ◽  
Chang Zoo Kim ◽  
Seung Uk Lee ◽  
Sang Joon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Lipid Level ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection ◽  
Photocoagulation Treatment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Bevacizumab Injection

Purpose: To investigate the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab injection combined with laser photocoagulation in patients with retinal microaneurysms.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 eyes of 21 patients who underwent intravitreal bevacizumab injection and/or laser photocoagulation to treat retinal macroaneurysms. Eleven eyes received the combination therapy (CT) and 10 eyes monotherapy (MT) (either bevacizumab injection or laser photocoagulation). Changes in visual acuity, central macular thickness, macroaneurysm size and location, blood pressure, and the lipid level were compared between the two groups.Results: The mean patient age was 74.0 ± 10.5 years and the mean study period 7.0 ± 5.3 months. The mean macroaneurysm diameter of the CT group was 480.00 ± 292.30 μm and that of the MT group 328.75 ± 87.09 μm. The diameter was significantly larger in the CT group (p = 0.002). The initial visual acuities were 0.91 ± 0.66 and 0.88 ± 0.83 in the CT and MT groups, respectively. At the 4-month follow-up, the visual acuities were 0.33 ± 0.26 and 0.17 ± 0.29 in the CT and MT groups, respectively, and had significantly improved only in the CT group (p = 0.042). The initial central macular thicknesses were 441.82 ± 226.81 and 541.63 ± 401.97 μm in the CT and MT groups, respectively. At the 4-month follow-up, the figures were 293.60 ± 46.10 and 269.00 ± 48.34 μm in the CT and MT groups, respectively, and had significantly decreased only in the CT group (p = 0.043). Compared to the initial findings, the proportion of patients whose final visual acuities improved by more than two lines were 73% and 40%, respectively, thus significantly higher in the CT group (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Combined intravitreal bevacizumab injection and laser photocoagulation treatment of retinal macroaneurysms improve visual acuity and decrease macular thickness.

scholarly journals Intravitreal bevacizumab injection alone or combined with macular photocoagulation compared to macular photocoagulation as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 876-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Jovanovic ◽  
Vladimir Canadanovic ◽  
Ana Sabo ◽  
Zorka Grgic ◽  
Milena Mitrovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection ◽  
Vegf Inhibitor ◽  
The Mean

Background/Aim. Within diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular edema (DME) is one of the leading causes of the loss of visual acuity. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor application alone or combined with macular focal/grid lasephotocoagulation compared with laser treatment alone. Methods. This prospective randomized clinical trial included 72 patients (120 treated eyes) with varying degrees of DR and DME. The DME treatment included intravitreal VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab (Avastin?) application, with and without laser treatment. Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) was administered intravitreally in 4-6-week intervals. Laser is applied 4-6 weeks after last dose of the drug as a part of combined treatment, or as the primary treatment. Results. The mean reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) for the eyes (n = 31) treated with bevacizumab alone was 162.23 ?m, for the eyes (n = 53) treated with combined treatment the mean reduction in CMT was 124.24 ?m, both statistically significant at p < 0.001. Laser macular photocolagulation as a part of combined treatment (in 53 eyes) significantly contributed to the CMT reduction, based on the paired t-test results (366.28 vs 323.0 ?m at p < 0.05). In our study, the mean visual acuity improvement of 0.161 logMAR was achieved in the group of eyes treated with bevacizumab alone, and 0.093 logMAR in the group with combined treatment, both statistically significant at p < 0.05. The effect of laser photocolagulation alone on visual acuity and CMT was not statistically significant. Conclusion. Treatment with bevacizumab alone or within combined treatment is more effective in treating DME than conventional macular laser treatment alone, both anatomically and functionally.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document