Neovascular Glaucoma Associated with Chronic Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Background To demonstrate the clinical features and natural course of chronic retinal detachment associated neovascular glaucoma. Methods Ten patients, diagnosed with chronic retinal detachment-associated neovascular glaucoma during 2007-2016 were retrospectively investigated. Besides chronic retinal detachment, no patients had any neovascular glaucoma-predisposing conditions, such as carotid artery disease. Retinal perfusion status was evaluated from postoperative visual acuity, intraocular pressures, ocular examination findings, and fluorescein angiography images. Results The mean age of patients was 57.5 (range: 22-78) years. Complete retinal reattachment was achieved in 3 eyes, while partial or total chronic retinal detachment persisted in 7 eyes. Wide-angle fundus fluorescein angiography revealed peripheral retinal capillary obstruction and severe non-perfusion. Neovascular glaucoma developed 213.4 months (17-634 months) after retinal detachment. Three eyes received Ahmed valve implantation, while 5 eyes received intravitreal bevacizumab injection. Intraocular pressure was controlled in 10 eyes. Two eyes developed phthisis bulbi during follow-up. Conclusions In eyes with a chronic retinal detachment history, iris neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma can develop due to retinal capillary obstruction and chronic retinal ischemia, even after achieving retinal reattachment. We suggest routine follow-up examinations for patients with chronic retinal detachment, particularly for eyes with retinal non-perfusion, as detected on fundus fluorescein angiography.

Evaluation of Ellipsoid Zone Changes in Different Types of Diabetic Macular Edema After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection

Purpose: To evaluate the ellipsoid zone (EZ) changes according to the types of diabetic macular edema (DME) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) after intravitreal bevacizumab injection. Methods: In this retrospective study, medical records of the patients who had treatment-naive DME and underwent intravitreal bevacizumab treatment between January 2015 and December 2021 were analyzed. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and completed the follow-up period of 12 months were divided into 4 groups according to the types of diabetic macular edema on OCT (Diffuse DME [Group-1], cystoid DME [Group-2], diffuse DME with serous retinal detachment (SRD) [Group-3] and cystoid DME with SRD [Group-4]). Primary outcomes were EZ changes between the groups.Results: 125 eyes of 96 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed the follow-up period were included in the study. There were no statistically significant differences in EZ improvements between the groups at 4, 6 and 12 months after treatment (p =0,594, p=0,836, p=0,486, p=0,748 respectively). The mean logMAR BCVA and CMT of all eyes showed significant improvement at 4, 6 and 12 months. When the mean CMT was compared between each groups, there were significant differences between the Group-1and Group-4 at 4, 6 and 12 months after treatment. (p<0,05)Conclusion: The BCVA gains and improvement in the CMT were maintained in all four DME types during the first year of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy. The improvement in EZ disruption was not depent on the type of DME and improved similarly in all groups.

Use of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection among Patients Undergoing Surgical Retinal Interventions at Tertiary Eye Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Intravitreal Bevacizumab injection has now become a routine procedure for retina specialists throughout the world. Easy availability of this monoclonal antibody molecule even in Nepal has brought a revolution in the management of various retinal diseases. This study aims to find out the prevalence of the use of intravitreal Bevacizumab for retinal diseases at the tertiary eye hospital. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in the retina department at a tertiary care hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 after obtaining ethical clearance from Nepal Health Research Council (Ref: 125/2020P). The sample size was calculated and the study enrolled all patients who received intravitreal Bevacizumab for retinal diseases using convenience sampling technique. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science Version 21. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated, along with frequency and percentage for binary data. Results: Out of 959 total surgical retinal interventions done 296 (30.86%) at 95% Confidence Interval (27.93-33.78) patients received intravitreal Bevacizumab. Out of total intravitreal Bevacizumab injections, 143 (36.7%) injections were given to retinal vein occlusions patients, 127 (32.6%) injections were given to diabetic retinopathy patients and 66 (17%) injections was given to age-related macular degeneration patients. Males 176 (59.5%) outnumbered the females 120 (40.5%) in receiving intravitreal Bevacizumab. Mean baseline Logarithm of the Minimal Angle of Resolution visual acuity, 1.1, improved to, 0.75, after 3 months of intravitreal Bevacizumab. Conclusions: Intravitreal Bevacizumab was one of the commonest retinal interventions used. Retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration were the commonest retinal diseases needing intravitreal Bevacizumab.

Effect of Topical Versus Sub-conjunctival Anaesthesia during Administration of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection

Purpose: To compare the anesthetic effect of topical proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% with sub-conjunctival lidocaine 2% for intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ophthalmology Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, from July 2017 to January 2018. Methods: Sixty 60 patients who needed intravitreal Bevacizumab were included in the study after approval from the ethical review board. Exclusion criteria were patients with conditions that could affect pain sensation, acute ocular inflammation, history of intravitreal injection, using systemic analgesic/sedatives, uncooperative patients and unable to understand the pain scale. Written informed consent was taken. Name, age, gender, diagnosis, previous intravitreal injection, hospital registration number, address and contact numbers were noted. Patients were briefed about the visual analogue scale. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A received proparacaine drops and group B was given subconjunctival lidocaine injections before intravitreal bevacizumab. Results: The mean age of patients in this study was 60.38 ± 10.55 years. There were 03 (5.0%) males and 57 (95.0%) females. Majority of the patients (30%) presented with choroidal neovascularization followed by diabetic maculopathy, vitreous hemorrhage, central retinal vein occlusion and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Mean pain score among both the groups was 3.67 ± 1.97 (topical group) and 1.70 ± 1.51 (sub-conjunctival group) respectively which was statistically significant (p-value 0.000). Among age, diabetes, duration of diabetes and hypertension, only hypertension had moderate correlation with the pain score (correlation coefficient = 0.316, p values = 0.017). Conclusion: Sub-conjunctival anaesthesia results in less pain during intravitreal drug administration as compared to the topical anaesthesia. Key Words: Intravitreal injections, Bevacizumab, Intravitreal Anti-VEGF, Anesthesia.

Combined Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Laser Photocoagulation to Treat Retinal Arterial Macroaneurysms

Purpose: To investigate the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab injection combined with laser photocoagulation in patients with retinal microaneurysms.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 21 eyes of 21 patients who underwent intravitreal bevacizumab injection and/or laser photocoagulation to treat retinal macroaneurysms. Eleven eyes received the combination therapy (CT) and 10 eyes monotherapy (MT) (either bevacizumab injection or laser photocoagulation). Changes in visual acuity, central macular thickness, macroaneurysm size and location, blood pressure, and the lipid level were compared between the two groups.Results: The mean patient age was 74.0 ± 10.5 years and the mean study period 7.0 ± 5.3 months. The mean macroaneurysm diameter of the CT group was 480.00 ± 292.30 μm and that of the MT group 328.75 ± 87.09 μm. The diameter was significantly larger in the CT group (p = 0.002). The initial visual acuities were 0.91 ± 0.66 and 0.88 ± 0.83 in the CT and MT groups, respectively. At the 4-month follow-up, the visual acuities were 0.33 ± 0.26 and 0.17 ± 0.29 in the CT and MT groups, respectively, and had significantly improved only in the CT group (p = 0.042). The initial central macular thicknesses were 441.82 ± 226.81 and 541.63 ± 401.97 μm in the CT and MT groups, respectively. At the 4-month follow-up, the figures were 293.60 ± 46.10 and 269.00 ± 48.34 μm in the CT and MT groups, respectively, and had significantly decreased only in the CT group (p = 0.043). Compared to the initial findings, the proportion of patients whose final visual acuities improved by more than two lines were 73% and 40%, respectively, thus significantly higher in the CT group (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Combined intravitreal bevacizumab injection and laser photocoagulation treatment of retinal macroaneurysms improve visual acuity and decrease macular thickness.

Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab and Aflibercept Injections for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Purpose: We examined differences in the treatment effects of intravitreal bevacizumab injections and intravitreal aflibercept injections in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 51 eyes of 49 patients who received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent injections after initial diagnosis with central serous chorioretinopathy. The patients were divided into two groups: one received an intravitreal bevacizumab injection, and another one received an intravitreal aflibercept injection. Patients with no reaction to treatment or a worsened condition, received repeat treatment with the same therapy. After treatment, patients were monitored for >3 months. Data were collected regarding best- corrected visual acuity (BCVA), subfoveal choroidal thickness, injection number, and treatment duration. Results: Both intravitreal bevacizumab injections and intravitreal aflibercept injections led to significant differences in BCVA (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (p < 0.0001, p = 0.011), compared between before and after treatment. However, no differences between groups were observed in mean change of BCVA or subfoveal choroidal thickness. In addition, there were no differences between groups in injection number and treatment duration. Conclusions: In patients with central serous chorioretinopathy, both intravitreal bevacizumab injections and intravitreal aflibercept injections are effective treatment methods. There were no differences between the two medicines in terms of functional and anatomical recovery, or the injection number and treatment duration.

Role of bevacizumab intraocular injection in the management of neovascular glaucoma

AIM: To assess the long-term effects of intraocular bevacizumab (Avastin) injections as an adjunctive drug to manage patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted consisting of 34 eyes with secondary NVG caused by proliferative diabetic retinopathy (n=25), ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (n=8), and retinal ischemia resulting from persistent detachment (n=1) were managed by intraocular injections of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL), in addition to other treatments. The main outcome measure was the change in the degree of iris neovascularization. Secondary outcomes included intraocular pressure and the number of additional interventions or antiglaucoma medications administered after injection. RESULTS: All patients were followed-up for at least 12mo. At the last follow-up, complete regression of rubeosis irides was detectable in 13 (38.2%) eyes and incomplete regression in 21 eyes (61.8%). The mean intraocular pressure was 45.32±7.185 mm Hg at baseline and significantly decreased to 26.15±5.679 mm Hg at the last follow-up visit (P=0.000005). Patients received an average of 4.97 injections. As additional treatments, 12 eyes (35%) received laser photocoagulation and 6 eyes (18%) underwent retinocryopexy. No further treatment was needed in 16 eyes (47.1%). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal bevacizumab injection can have a favorable effect in controlling intraocular pressure and pain control in patients with NVG because it decreases the angiogenesis and helps to augment the results of conventional procedures. The primary cause of retinal ischemia should be always targeted.