scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes in Soft Tissue Repair Surgery With and Without Femoral Derotation Osteotomy for Patellar Dislocation: A Retrospective Study

Author(s):  
Chongyi Fan ◽  
Guangmin Yang ◽  
Yingzhen Niu ◽  
Yirong Xu ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The purpose of our study was to report the clinical outcomes of isolated soft tissue repair or combined femoral derotation osteotomy (DFO) in patients with patellar dislocation with increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA).Methods: A total of 63 patients with patellar dislocation were retrospectively reviewed in this study. 33 patients received isolated soft tissue repair (group 1) and 30 patients were a combination with a femoral deroration osteotomy (group 2). CT were used to assess the correction of the femoral anteversion angle, the tibia tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patellar tilt (PTA), and the congruence angle (CA) following the two surgical programs. Subjective scores, such as Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm ,Tegner, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, were used to evaluate knee function.Results: In group 2, the mean of the FAA was corrected to15.76 ±2.02° postoperatively compared with 29.16± 2.87° preoperatively (P < 0.001). The TT-TG distance was decreased from 19.03 ±2.52 mm before surgery to 17.80 ±2.24 mm after surgery (< 0.001). Besides, Postoperative PTA and CA were corrected in both groups (P < 0.001). Kujala, IKDC, Lysholm and VAS scores of between groups were significantly improved after operation (P < 0.001). Furthermore, Compared with the isolated soft tissue repair surgery, the combined surgery achieve better postoperative outcomes in Kujala, (IKDC), Lysholm and VAS scores (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Although DFO can be used in combination with DFO to achieve better results, it should also be tailored to the individual and reduce patient suffering.

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarunas Tarasevicius ◽  
Uldis Kesteris ◽  
Romas Jonas Kalesinskas ◽  
Hans Wingstrand

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Friedstat ◽  
Michelle R Coriddi ◽  
Eric G Halvorson ◽  
Joseph J Disa

Wound management and soft-tissue repair can vary depending on the location. The head and neck, chest and back, arm and forearm, hand, abdomen, gluteal area and perineum, thigh, knee, lower leg, and foot all have different local options and preferred free flaps to use for reconstruction. Secondary reconstruction requires a detailed analysis of all aspects of the wound including any scars, soft tissue and/or skin deficits, functional defects, contour defects, complex or composite defects, and/or unstable previous wound coverage. Careful monitoring of both the patient and reconstruction is necessary in the postoperative period to ensure long-term success.   This review contains 2 figures and 17 references. Key Words: free tissue transfer, pedicle flaps, soft-tissue coverage, wound closure, wound healing, wound management, wound reconstruction, tissue flaps


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Smith ◽  
Mateo Garcia ◽  
Kenneth M. Dupont ◽  
Geoffrey B. Higgs ◽  
Ken Gall ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document