scholarly journals Treatment planning comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with Trilogy and Halcyon for bilateral breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Xiutong Lin ◽  
Guifang Zhang ◽  
Qingtao Qiu ◽  
Chengqiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Bilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Skin Dose ◽  
Delivery Time ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The Halcyon is a new machine from the Varian company. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetry of the Halcyon in treatment of bilateral breast cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Methods: On CT images of 10 patients with bilateral breast cancer, four Halcyon plans with different setup fields were generated, and dosimetric comparisons using Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test were conducted among the four plans. Whole and partial arc plans on the Trilogy and the Halcyon, referred to as T-4arc, T-8arc, H-4arc and H-8arc, were designed. The prescription dose was 50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. All plans were designed with the Eclipse version 15.5 treatment planning system. The dosimetric differences between whole and partial arc plans in the same accelerator were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The better Halcyon plan was selected for the further dosimetric comparison of the plan quality and delivery efficiency between the Trilogy and the Halcyon. Results:Halcyon plans with high‐quality megavoltage cone beam CT setup fields increased the Dmean, D2 and V107 of the planning target volume (PTV) and the V5 and Dmean of the heart, left ventricle (LV) and lungs compared with other Halcyon setup plans. The mean dose and low dose volume of the heart, lungs and liver were significantly decreased in T-8arc plans compared to T-4arc plans. In terms of the V5, V20, V30, V40 and Dmean of the heart, the V20, V30, V40 and Dmean of the LV, the V30, V40, Dmax and Dmean of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), and the V5 and V40 of lungs, H-8arc was significantly higher than H-4arc (p<0.05). Compared with the Trilogy’s plans, the Halcyon’s plans reduced the high-dose volume of the heart and LV but increased the mean dose of the heart. For the dose of the LAD and the V20 and V30 of lungs, there was no significant difference between the two accelerators. Compared with the Trilogy, plans on the Halcyon significantly increased the skin dose but also significantly reduced the delivery time. Conclusion: For the Halcyon, the whole-arc plans have more dosimetric advantages than partial-arc plans in bilateral breast cancer radiotherapy. Although the mean dose of the heart and the skin dose are increased, the doses of the cardiac substructure and other OARs are comparable to the Trilogy, and the delivery time is significantly reduced.

scholarly journals Treatment planning comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with the trilogy and the Halcyon for bilateral breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Xiutong Lin ◽  
Guifang Zhang ◽  
Qingtao Qiu ◽  
Chengqiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Bilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Skin Dose ◽  
Delivery Time ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The Halcyon is a new machine from the Varian company. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetry of the Halcyon in treatment of bilateral breast cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Methods On CT images of 10 patients with bilateral breast cancer, four Halcyon plans with different setup fields were generated, and dosimetric comparisons using Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test were conducted among the four plans. Whole and partial arc plans on the Trilogy and the Halcyon, referred to as T-4arc, T-8arc, H-4arc and H-8arc, were designed. The prescription dose was 50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. All plans were designed with the Eclipse version 15.5 treatment planning system. The dosimetric differences between whole and partial arc plans in the same accelerator were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The better Halcyon plan was selected for the further dosimetric comparison of the plan quality and delivery efficiency between the Trilogy and the Halcyon. Results Halcyon plans with high‐quality megavoltage cone beam CT setup fields increased the Dmean, D2 and V107 of the planning target volume (PTV) and the V5 and Dmean of the heart, left ventricle (LV) and lungs compared with other Halcyon setup plans. The mean dose and low dose volume of the heart, lungs and liver were significantly decreased in T-8arc plans compared to T-4arc plans. In terms of the V5, V20, V30, V40 and Dmean of the heart, the V20, V30, V40 and Dmean of the LV, the V30, V40, Dmax and Dmean of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), and the V5 and V40 of lungs, H-8arc was significantly higher than H-4arc (p < 0.05). Compared with the Trilogy’s plans, the Halcyon’s plans reduced the high-dose volume of the heart and LV but increased the mean dose of the heart. For the dose of the LAD and the V20 and V30 of lungs, there was no significant difference between the two accelerators. Compared with the Trilogy, plans on the Halcyon significantly increased the skin dose but also significantly reduced the delivery time. Conclusion For the Halcyon, the whole-arc plans have more dosimetric advantages than partial-arc plans in bilateral breast cancer radiotherapy. Although the mean dose of the heart and the skin dose are increased, the doses of the cardiac substructure and other OARs are comparable to the Trilogy, and the delivery time is significantly reduced.

scholarly journals Treatment Planning Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy With Trilogy and Halcyon for Bilateral Breast Cancer 

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Xiutong Lin ◽  
Guifang Zhang ◽  
Qingtao Qiu ◽  
Chengqiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Bilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Skin Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Delivery Time ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: To evaluate the dosimetry of Halcyon in treatment of bilateral breast cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Methods: On CT images of 10 patients with bilateral breast cancer, four Halcyon plans with different setup fields were generated and dosimetric comparisons were conducted among the four plans to select an optimal setup field mode. The four setup-field plans were referred to as CBCT-H, CBCT-L, MV-H, MV-L. Whole and partial arc plans on Trilogy and Halcyon referred to as T-4arc, T-8arc, H-4arc and H-8arc were designed. The dosimetric differences between whole and partial arc plans in the same accelerator were compared to understand the most suitable field setting mode. The better Halcyon plan was selected to the further dosimetric comparison of the plan quality and delivery efficiency between Trilogy and Halcyon. Results: CBCT-H plans increased Dmean, D2 and V107 of planning target volume (PTV) and V5 and Dmean of the heart, left ventricle (LV) and lungs compared to other plans. No significantly dosimetric differences were observed in PTV and organs at risk (OARs) among CBCT-L, MV-H and MV-L. The mean dose and low dose volume of heart, lungs and liver were significantly decreased in T-8arc plans. In terms of V5, V20, V30, V40 and Dmean of the heart, V20, V30, V40 and Dmean of the LV, V30, V40, Dmax and Dmean of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), V5 and V40 of lungs, H-8arc was significantly higher than H-4arc (p<0.05). Compared to Trilogy’s plans, Halcyon’s plans reduced the high-dose volume of the heart and LV, but increased the mean dose of the heart. For the dose of the LAD and the V20, V30 of lungs, there was no statistical difference between the two accelerators. Compared with Trilogy, plans on Halcyon significantly increased the skin dose, but also significantly reduced the delivery time. Conclusion: For Halcyon, the whole-arc plans has more dosimetric advantages in bilateral breast cancer radiotherapy. Although the mean dose of the heart and the skin dose are increased, the dose of the cardiac substructure and other OARs are comparable to the Trilogy, and the delivery time is significantly reduced.

Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for adjuvant treatment of bilateral breast cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Reena Phurailatpam ◽  
Tabassum Wadasadawala ◽  
Kamalnayan Chauhan ◽  
Subhajit Panda ◽  
Rajiv Sarin
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Helical Tomotherapy ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Bilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Dosimetric Comparison ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose: Dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) in the treatment of bilateral breast cancer (BBC). Materials and methods: Ten patients treated on HT were selected retrospectively. Dose prescription was 50 Gy in 25 fractions to breast/chest wall and supraclavicular fossa (SCF) while tumour bed was simultaneously boosted to 61 Gy in 25 fractions. VMAT plans were made with four mono-isocentric partial arcs. The monitoring unit (MU) and treatment time were used to quantify the treatment efficiency. Target volumes were compared for homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) while organs at risk (OARs) were compared for relevant dose volumes and integral doses (IDs). Result: For targets, no significant difference is observed between VMAT and HT in CI but VMAT could give better HI. The mean lung dose, V20 and V5 is 10·6 Gy versus 8·4 Gy (p-value 0·03), 12% versus 11·5% (p-value 0·5) and 78·1% versus 43·4% (p-value 0·005), respectively. The mean heart dose, V30 and V5 is 4·9 Gy versus 4·7 Gy (p-value 0·88), 0·5% versus 1·5% (p-value 0·18) and 26·2% versus 22·8% (p-value 0·4). Integral dose (ID) for the whole body and heart are comparable: 289 Gy kg versus 299 Gy kg (p-value 0·24) and 2·9 Gy kg versus 2·8 Gy kg (p-value 0·80). ID for lungs was significantly higher with VMAT: 7·9 Gy kg versus 6·3 Gy kg (p-value 0·03). There is a 53% reduction in treatment time and 78% in MU with VMAT against HT. Conclusion: VMAT can generate clinically acceptable plans comparable to HT for BBC. HT shows better control over low dose spillage in lungs compared to VMAT thereby increasing ID to lungs. VMAT shows better homogeneity and efficient treatment delivery than HT.

scholarly journals Dosimetric comparison for volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensitymodulated radiotherapy on the left-sided chest wall and internal mammary nodes irradiation in treating post-mastectomy breast cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Xiao Li Yu ◽  
Wei Gang Hu ◽  
Jia Yi Chen ◽  
Jia Zhou Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Contralateral Breast ◽  
Delivery Time ◽  
Internal Mammary Nodes ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Internal Mammary ◽  
Dose Homogeneity ◽  
The Mean

AbstractBackground. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of applying volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on the post-mastectomy left-sided breast cancer patients, with the involvement of internal mammary nodes (IMN).Patients and methods. The prescription dose was 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions, and the clinical target volume included the left chest wall (CW) and IMN. VMAT plans were created and compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans on Pinnacle treatment planning system. Comparative endpoints were dose homogeneity within planning target volume (PTV), target dose coverage, doses to the critical structures including heart, lungs and the contralateral breast, number of monitor units and treatment delivery time.Results. VMAT and IMRT plans showed similar PTV dose homogeneity, but, VMAT provided a better dose coverage for IMN than IMRT (p = 0.017). The mean dose (Gy), V30(%) and V10(%) for the heart were 13.5 ± 5.0 Gy, 9.9% ± 5.9% and 50.2% ± 29.0% by VMAT, and 14.0 ± 5.4 Gy, 10.6% ± 5.8% and 55.7% ± 29.6% by IMRT, respectively. The left lung mean dose (Gy), V20(%), V10(%) and the right lung V5(%) were significantly reduced from 14.1 ± 2.3 Gy, 24.2% ± 5.9%, 42.4% ± 11.9% and 41.2% ± 12.3% with IMRT to 12.8 ± 1.9 Gy, 21.0% ± 3.8%, 37.1% ± 8.4% and 32.1% ± 18.2% with VMAT, respectively. The mean dose to the contralateral breast was 1.7 ± 1.2 Gy with VMAT and 2.3 ± 1.6 Gy with IMRT. Finally, VMAT reduced the number of monitor units by 24% and the treatment time by 53%, as compared to IMRT.Conclusions. Compared to 5-be am step-and-shot IMRT, VMAT achieves similar or superior target coverage and a better normal tissue sparing, with fewer monitor units and shorter delivery time.

Quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy head and neck cancer treatment using PRESAGE® dosimeter

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalil ur Rehman ◽  
Muhammad Isa ◽  
Nisar Ahmad ◽  
H. M. Noor ul Huda Khan Asghar ◽  
Zaheer A. Gilani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Calculated Dose

AbstractBackgroundAccurate three-dimensional dosimetry is essential in modern radiotherapy techniques such as volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In this research work, the PRESAGE® dosimeter was used as quality assurance (QA) tool for VMAT planning for head and neck (H&N) cancer.Material and methodComputer tomography (CT) scans of an Image Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) H&N anthropomorphic phantom with both IROC standard insert and PRESAGE® insert were acquired separately. Both CT scans were imported into the Pinnacle (9.4 version) TPS for treatment planning, where the structures [planning target volume (PTV), organs at risk) and thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) were manually contoured and used to optimise a VMAT plan. Treatment planning was done using VMAT (dual arc: 182°–178°, 178°–182°). Beam profile comparisons and gamma analysis were used to quantify agreement with film, PRESAGE® measurement and treatment planning system (TPS) calculated dose distribution.ResultsThe average ratio of TLD measured to calculated doses at the four PTV locations in the H&N phantom were between 0·95 to 0·99 for all three VMAT deliveries. Dose profiles were taken along the left–right, the anterior–posterior and superior–inferior axes, and good agreement was found between the PRESAGE® and Pinnacle profile. The mean value of gamma results for three VMAT deliveries in axial and sagittal planes were found to be 94·24 and 93·16% when compared with film and Pinnacle, respectively. The average values comparing the PRESAGE® results and dose values calculated on Pinnacle were observed to be 95·29 and 94·38% in the said planes, respectively, using a 5%/3 mm gamma criteria.ConclusionThe PRESAGE® dose measurements and calculated dose of pinnacle show reasonable agreement in both axial and sagittal planes for complex dual arc VMAT treatment plans. In general, the PRESAGE® dosimeter is found to be a feasible QA tool of VMAT plan for H&N cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer including internal mammary nodes

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-507
Author(s):  
Yuan Xu ◽  
Pan Ma ◽  
Zhihui Hu ◽  
Yuan Tian ◽  
Kuo Men ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Left Lung ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Internal Mammary Nodes ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Internal Mammary ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT) is proposed to reduce toxicity in heart and lungs for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer, including internal mammary nodes (IMN). Patients and methods This retrospective study included 10 patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent locoregional radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. For each patient, the ncVMAT plan was designed with four partial arcs comprising two coplanar arcs and two non-coplanar arcs, with a couch rotating to 90°. The prescribed dose was normalized to cover 95% of planning target volume (PTV), with 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions. For each ncVMAT plan, dosimetric parameters were compared with the coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (coV-MAT) plan. Results T here were improvements in conformity index, homogeneity index and V55 of total target volume (PTVall) comparing ncVMAT to coVMAT (p < 0.001). Among the organs at risk, the average V30, V20, V10, V5, and mean dose (Dmean) of the heart decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Furthermore, ncVMAT significantly reduced the mean V20, V10, V5, and Dmean of left lung and the mean V10 and V5 and Dmean of contralateral lung (p < 0.001). An improved sparing of the left anterior descending coronary artery and right breast were also observed with ncVMAT (p < 0.001). Conclusions Compared to coVMAT, ncVMAT provides improved conformity and homogeneity of whole P TV, better dose sparing of the heart, bilateral lungs, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and right breast for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with IMN, potentially reducing the risk of normal tissue damage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document