scholarly journals Non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer including internal mammary nodes

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-507
Author(s):  
Yuan Xu ◽  
Pan Ma ◽  
Zhihui Hu ◽  
Yuan Tian ◽  
Kuo Men ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Left Lung ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Internal Mammary Nodes ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Internal Mammary ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT) is proposed to reduce toxicity in heart and lungs for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer, including internal mammary nodes (IMN). Patients and methods This retrospective study included 10 patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent locoregional radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. For each patient, the ncVMAT plan was designed with four partial arcs comprising two coplanar arcs and two non-coplanar arcs, with a couch rotating to 90°. The prescribed dose was normalized to cover 95% of planning target volume (PTV), with 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions. For each ncVMAT plan, dosimetric parameters were compared with the coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (coV-MAT) plan. Results T here were improvements in conformity index, homogeneity index and V55 of total target volume (PTVall) comparing ncVMAT to coVMAT (p < 0.001). Among the organs at risk, the average V30, V20, V10, V5, and mean dose (Dmean) of the heart decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Furthermore, ncVMAT significantly reduced the mean V20, V10, V5, and Dmean of left lung and the mean V10 and V5 and Dmean of contralateral lung (p < 0.001). An improved sparing of the left anterior descending coronary artery and right breast were also observed with ncVMAT (p < 0.001). Conclusions Compared to coVMAT, ncVMAT provides improved conformity and homogeneity of whole P TV, better dose sparing of the heart, bilateral lungs, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and right breast for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with IMN, potentially reducing the risk of normal tissue damage.

scholarly journals Dosimetric comparison for volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensitymodulated radiotherapy on the left-sided chest wall and internal mammary nodes irradiation in treating post-mastectomy breast cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Xiao Li Yu ◽  
Wei Gang Hu ◽  
Jia Yi Chen ◽  
Jia Zhou Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Contralateral Breast ◽  
Delivery Time ◽  
Internal Mammary Nodes ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
Internal Mammary ◽  
Dose Homogeneity ◽  
The Mean

AbstractBackground. The aim of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of applying volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on the post-mastectomy left-sided breast cancer patients, with the involvement of internal mammary nodes (IMN).Patients and methods. The prescription dose was 50 Gy delivered in 25 fractions, and the clinical target volume included the left chest wall (CW) and IMN. VMAT plans were created and compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans on Pinnacle treatment planning system. Comparative endpoints were dose homogeneity within planning target volume (PTV), target dose coverage, doses to the critical structures including heart, lungs and the contralateral breast, number of monitor units and treatment delivery time.Results. VMAT and IMRT plans showed similar PTV dose homogeneity, but, VMAT provided a better dose coverage for IMN than IMRT (p = 0.017). The mean dose (Gy), V30(%) and V10(%) for the heart were 13.5 ± 5.0 Gy, 9.9% ± 5.9% and 50.2% ± 29.0% by VMAT, and 14.0 ± 5.4 Gy, 10.6% ± 5.8% and 55.7% ± 29.6% by IMRT, respectively. The left lung mean dose (Gy), V20(%), V10(%) and the right lung V5(%) were significantly reduced from 14.1 ± 2.3 Gy, 24.2% ± 5.9%, 42.4% ± 11.9% and 41.2% ± 12.3% with IMRT to 12.8 ± 1.9 Gy, 21.0% ± 3.8%, 37.1% ± 8.4% and 32.1% ± 18.2% with VMAT, respectively. The mean dose to the contralateral breast was 1.7 ± 1.2 Gy with VMAT and 2.3 ± 1.6 Gy with IMRT. Finally, VMAT reduced the number of monitor units by 24% and the treatment time by 53%, as compared to IMRT.Conclusions. Compared to 5-be am step-and-shot IMRT, VMAT achieves similar or superior target coverage and a better normal tissue sparing, with fewer monitor units and shorter delivery time.

Non-coplanar VMAT improves plan quality for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with internal mammary nodes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Xu ◽  
Pan Ma ◽  
Zhihu Hu ◽  
Yuan Tian ◽  
Kuo Men ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Left Lung ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Internal Mammary Nodes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Internal Mammary ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose A planning study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of non-coplanar volume modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT) for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with internal mammary nodes. Methods and materials Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer after breast conserving surgery were retrospectively studied. The planning target volumes (PTV) were contoured encompassing the whole breast/chestwall, internal mammary nodes (IMN) and supraclavicular nodal (SCN) region. For each patient, ncVMAT plan with 4 partial arcs composing of two coplanar arcs and two non-coplanar arcs with couch rotating to 90˚ was generated. The prescription dose was normalized to cover 95% of PTV with 50 Gy delivering in 25 fractions. For each ncVMAT plan, dosimetric parameters were compared with coplanar VMAT (coVMAT) plan optimizing with identical coplanar beam angle arrangement. Results With ncVMAT, the mean conformity index of the whole PTV increased from 0.82±0.02 to 0.86±0.01 (p=0.005), and there was no significant difference for the homogeneity index. The mean coverage of internal mammary target volume (PTVimn) with ncVMAT increased from 88.77±3.07% to 91.67±3.84% comparing with coVMAT (p=0.005). Meanwhile, the V55 in PTVscn and PTVimn decreased significantly from 5.76±6.03%, 13.73±7.77% to 2.94±3.93%, 3.75±3.36%, separately (p<0.01). For organs at risk, the average V30, V20, V10, V5 and Dmean of heart decreased from 5.13±3.22%, 12.18±7.29%, 33.98±15.73%, 72.03±16.79% and 10.47±2.97 Gy to 4.86±2.54%, 9.35±5.43%, 25.16±12.42%, 62.27±13.18% and 9.08±2.34 Gy, separately (p<0.01). Furthermore, ncVMAT significantly reduced the mean V20, V10, V5, Dmean of left lung, and V10, V5, Dmean of contralateral lung (p<0.01). A better sparing of LAD descending coronary artery and right breast were also shown with ncVMAT (p<0.01). Conclusions Compared to coVMAT, ncVMAT provides better conformity, lower V55 in PTVscn and PTVimn, better coverage of PTVimn, better dose sparing in heart, bilateral lung, LAD and right breast for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with internal mammary nodes, which potentially increase the local control in IMN and reduce the risk of deleterious effects.

scholarly journals Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes: the advantage of dosimetric data and safety of toxicities

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 747-754
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Doi ◽  
Minoru Nakao ◽  
Hideharu Miura ◽  
Shuichi Ozawa ◽  
Masahiro Kenjo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Irradiation Dose ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Regional Lymph Nodes ◽  
Dosimetric Data ◽  
Arc Therapy

ABSTRACT To improve the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes, we planned Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which combines conventional tangential field mainly for the chest area and VMAT mainly for the supraclavicular area and marginal zone. In this study, we compared the dosimetric impact between traditional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Hybrid VMAT and observed toxicities following Hybrid VMAT. A total of 70 patients indicated between October 2016 and December 2017 were included. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy/25 fractions. For the dosimetric impact, 3DCRT and Hybrid VMAT plans were compared in each patient with respect to the dosimetric parameters. Toxicities were followed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The median follow-up duration was 319 days. For the dosimetric impact, the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of PTV were significantly improved in the Hybrid VMAT plan compared with that in the 3DCRT plan (HI, 0.15 ± 0.07 in Hybrid VMAT vs 0.41 ± 0.19 in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.001; CI, 1.61 ± 0.44 in Hybrid VMAT vs 2.10 ± 0.56 in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.001). The mean irradiated ipsilateral lung dose was not significantly different in both plans (12.0 ± 2.4 Gy in Hybrid VMAT vs 11.8 ± 2.8 Gy in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.533). Regarding toxicity, there were no patients who developed ≥grade 3 acute toxicity and ≥grade 2 pneumonitis during the follow-up. Hybrid VMAT for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes was a reasonable technique that improved the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose to the planning target volume while keeping the irradiation dose to organs at risk to a minimum.

scholarly journals Treatment planning comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with Trilogy and Halcyon for bilateral breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Xiutong Lin ◽  
Guifang Zhang ◽  
Qingtao Qiu ◽  
Chengqiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Bilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Skin Dose ◽  
Delivery Time ◽  
Dose Volume ◽  
Arc Therapy ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: The Halcyon is a new machine from the Varian company. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetry of the Halcyon in treatment of bilateral breast cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Methods: On CT images of 10 patients with bilateral breast cancer, four Halcyon plans with different setup fields were generated, and dosimetric comparisons using Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test were conducted among the four plans. Whole and partial arc plans on the Trilogy and the Halcyon, referred to as T-4arc, T-8arc, H-4arc and H-8arc, were designed. The prescription dose was 50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. All plans were designed with the Eclipse version 15.5 treatment planning system. The dosimetric differences between whole and partial arc plans in the same accelerator were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The better Halcyon plan was selected for the further dosimetric comparison of the plan quality and delivery efficiency between the Trilogy and the Halcyon. Results:Halcyon plans with high‐quality megavoltage cone beam CT setup fields increased the Dmean, D2 and V107 of the planning target volume (PTV) and the V5 and Dmean of the heart, left ventricle (LV) and lungs compared with other Halcyon setup plans. The mean dose and low dose volume of the heart, lungs and liver were significantly decreased in T-8arc plans compared to T-4arc plans. In terms of the V5, V20, V30, V40 and Dmean of the heart, the V20, V30, V40 and Dmean of the LV, the V30, V40, Dmax and Dmean of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), and the V5 and V40 of lungs, H-8arc was significantly higher than H-4arc (p<0.05). Compared with the Trilogy’s plans, the Halcyon’s plans reduced the high-dose volume of the heart and LV but increased the mean dose of the heart. For the dose of the LAD and the V20 and V30 of lungs, there was no significant difference between the two accelerators. Compared with the Trilogy, plans on the Halcyon significantly increased the skin dose but also significantly reduced the delivery time. Conclusion: For the Halcyon, the whole-arc plans have more dosimetric advantages than partial-arc plans in bilateral breast cancer radiotherapy. Although the mean dose of the heart and the skin dose are increased, the doses of the cardiac substructure and other OARs are comparable to the Trilogy, and the delivery time is significantly reduced.

scholarly journals Dosimetric Comparison of Three Radiotherapy Techniques in Irradiation of Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients after Radical Mastectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jian Hu ◽  
Guang Han ◽  
Yu Lei ◽  
Ximing Xu ◽  
Wei Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radical Mastectomy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ipsilateral Lung ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction. This study is aimed at evaluating the dosimetric differences among target segmented planning (TSP), conventional 9-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (9FIMRT) planning, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for postmastectomy radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer patients. Material and Methods. Fifteen left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent radical mastectomy were enrolled. In TSP, the planning target volume (PTV) was divided into four regions (supra/infraclavicular, chest wall, external mammary region, and internal mammary region), and each individual PTV region was treated with respective fixed fields. Results. The VMAT plans showed superior to PTV dose conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), protection of the ipsilateral lung, monitor units (MUs), and maximum dose (Dmax) to the contralateral breast compared with TSP and 9FIMRT plans. The TSP provided better protection for Dmean of the heart and left ventricle (p<0.05). A dose for left anterior descending artery from the three techniques had no significant difference. Compared with the 9FIMRT plans, the V5Gy (%) and V10Gy (%) for the ipsilateral lung were significantly reduced with TSP and VMAT (p<0.05). The V5Gy (%) and V10Gy (%) for the ipsilateral lung turned out to be similar between VMAT and TSP techniques. Conclusions. Our study indicates that VMAT should be a better choice of radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients after radical mastectomy. If VMAT is unavailable, 9FIMRT can achieve better CI and HI values and be more MU-efficient compared with TSP; however, TSP can effectively reduce the low dose volume of the ipsilateral lungs and heart.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document