scholarly journals Different Paths to the Modern State in Europe: The Interaction between Domestic Political Economy and Interstate Competition

Author(s):  
K. Kıvanç Karaman ◽  
Sevket Pamuk
1947 ◽  
Vol 57 (227) ◽  
pp. 353
Author(s):  
C. R. Fay ◽  
Harold A. Innis

1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-165
Author(s):  
Kevin Anderson

One of the century's greatest Marx editors, Rubel placed Marx's critique of the modern state on an equal footing with Marx's critique of political economy. An erudite scholar who in his Marx Oeuvres I-IV (1963-1994) pointed repeatedly to differences between Marx and Engels, he became a thorn in the side of Stalinist Marx editors, especially in France. Volume IV of Rubel's Marx Oeuvres, published less than two years before his death, offers a good vantage point from which to measure his overall contribution.


1948 ◽  
Vol 18 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
W. K. Hancock ◽  
Harold A. Innis

2019 ◽  
pp. 147488511989045
Author(s):  
Maurits de Jongh

Michael Oakeshott’s account of political economy is claimed to have found its ‘apotheosis under Thatcherism’. Against critics who align him with a preference for small government, this article points to Oakeshott’s stress on the indispensability of an infrastructure of government-provided public goods, in which individual agency and associative freedom can flourish. I argue that Oakeshott’s account of political economy invites a contestatory politics over three types of public goods, which epitomize the unresolvable tension he diagnosed between nomocratic and teleocratic conceptions of the modern state. These three types are the system of civil law, the by-products of the operation of civil law and public goods which result from policies. The article concludes that Oakeshott offers an important corrective to political theories which favour either market mediation or radical democratic governance of the commons as self-sustaining modes of providing and enjoying goods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document