District Court Amicus Brief of the National Legislative Association on Prescription Drug Prices, the New Hampshire Medical Society, and Prescription Policy Choices in Support of Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Flynn ◽  
Derek D. Lick
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-412
Author(s):  
Emanuela Gambini

On March 10, 2014, the U.S. District Court of Utah, Central Division, decided in University of Utah Research Foundation, et al., v. Ambry Genetics Corporation, holding that “Plaintiffs are not entitled to a preliminary injunction”, as they “are unable to establish that they are likely to succeed on the merits of the claims” nor “that the equitable factors support issuance of the requested injunction”.This case note gives an overview of the U.S. District Court's of Utah memorandum decision and order denying plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction and discusses its implications for the implementation of the criterion of isolation to “synthetic” DNA sequences, such as primers and probes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen W. Schondelmeyer ◽  
Leigh Purvis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document