The Ripple Effect of Intellectual Property Policy: Empirical Evidence from Stem Cell Research and Development

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yael Bregman-Eschet ◽  
Sharon Bar-Ziv ◽  
Talya Ponchek ◽  
Niva Elkin-Koren
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar V. Borlongan ◽  
Camille McWhirter ◽  
Caroline Fultz-Carver ◽  
Kevin T. FitzGerald ◽  
Paul R. Sanberg

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 769-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev Kumar ◽  
Jenny J. Yeh ◽  
Dennis Fernandez ◽  
Nels Hansen

Stem cell research and the intellectual property derived from it, because of its potential to completely transform health care, demand an especially high level of consideration from business and patent prosecution perspectives. As with other revolutionary technologies, ordinary risks are amplified (e.g., litigation), and ordinarily irrelevant considerations may become important (e.g., heightened level of both domestic and foreign legislative risk). In the first part of this article, general strategies for patent prosecutors such as several prosecution considerations and methods for accelerating patent prosecution process are presented. In the second part, patent prosecution challenges of stem cell—related patents and possible solutions are discussed. In the final part, ethical and public policy issues particular to stem cell—related and other biotechnological inventions are summarized. ( Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2007:769-774)


2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiranjib Chakraborty ◽  
Pochuen Shieh ◽  
Govindasamy Agoramoorthy

2007 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 1490-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mita Giacomini ◽  
Francoise Baylis ◽  
Jason Robert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document