Hard Times or Great Expectations?: Dividend Omissions and Dividend Cuts by UK Firms

Author(s):  
Andrew Benito ◽  
Garry Young
2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 1186-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Brockhoff ◽  
Tim Krieger ◽  
Daniel Meierrieks

2019 ◽  
pp. 139-174
Author(s):  
Mary L. Mullen

This chapter demonstrates how Charles Dickens’s novels embrace ‘reactionary reform’: a vision of the future that is actually a return to an anachronistic past. Reactionary reform restores origins that institutions erase in their drive towards futurity, whether those origins are Sissy Jupe’s life with her father in Hard Times, Esther Summerson’s parentage in Bleak House or the humble home that Pip mistakenly disavows in Great Expectations. Reactivating origins allows a different stance towards institutions: instead of settling down and accepting their established rhythms, characters inhabit institutions, dwelling temporarily in them without acceding to their terms. But Dickens’s vision of reform does not extend to everyone. He reinforces settler colonialism by representing particular groups of people as outside of history and futurity altogether. Validating anachronisms and criticising them in turn, Dickens imagines progressive change that rejects modern institutionalism but, in the process, shores up the racialised abstractions upon which settler colonial institutions depend.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document