Identifying Volatility Risk Premia from Fixed Income Asian Options

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caio Almeida ◽  
Jose Vicente
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Afonso Faias ◽  
Pedro Santa-Clara

Traditional methods of asset allocation (such as mean–variance optimization) are not adequate for option portfolios because the distribution of returns is non-normal and the short sample of option returns available makes it difficult to estimate their distribution. We propose a method to optimize a portfolio of European options, held to maturity, with a myopic objective function that overcomes these limitations. In an out-of-sample exercise incorporating realistic transaction costs, the portfolio strategy delivers a Sharpe ratio of 0.82 with positive skewness. This performance is mostly obtained by exploiting mispricing between options and not by loading on jump or volatility risk premia.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 75-103
Author(s):  
Byung Jin Kang ◽  
Sohyun Kang ◽  
Sun-Joong Yoon

This study examines the forecasting ability of the adjusted implied volatility (AIV), which is suggested by Kang, Kim and Yoon (2009), using the horserace competition with historical volatility, model-free implied volatility, and BS implied volatility in the KOSPI 200 index options market. The adjusted implied volatility is applicable when investors are not risk averse or when underlying returns do not follow a normal distribution. This implies that AIV is consistent with the presence of risk premia for other risk such as volatility risk and jump risk. Using KOSPI 200 index options, it is shown that the AIV outperforms other volatility estimates in terms of the unbiasedness for future realized volatilities as well as the forecasting errors.


Author(s):  
Andrea Buraschi ◽  
Fabio Trojani ◽  
Andrea Vedolin
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Christoffersen ◽  
Kris Jacobs ◽  
Lotfi Karoui ◽  
Karim Mimouni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document