What Do Voters Learn from Foreign News? Emulation, Backlash, and Public Support for Trade Agreements

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Fang Chiang ◽  
Jason Kuo ◽  
Megumi Naoi ◽  
Jin-Tan Liu
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Fang Chiang ◽  
Jason Kuo ◽  
Megumi Naoi ◽  
Jin-Tan Liu

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Patricia C Borstorff ◽  
Mark W Hearn ◽  
Falynn Turley

Do attitudes toward globalization change with economic conditions? This paper compares student attitudes during an economic expansion with student attitudes during an economic recession. Globalization has resulted in lower prices, more choices, and a blurring of the lines of national identity for many products. Its impact also includes loss of domestic jobs, trade disputes, and challenges to national sovereignty by organizations, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO). Two surveys were administered in the College of Commerce and Business Administration at an AACSB-accredited southeastern United States university. The first took place in 2003 while the region was enjoying low unemployment and a vigorous economic expansion. The second was administered in 2009 during a time of significantly higher unemployment and economic recession. The 2003 survey found very positive views towards most aspects of globalization. In contrast, the second survey during markedly more depressed economic times found students were more concerned with their own self-interest, preferring less government interference and less globalization. The results suggest that attempts to promote trade agreements should consider economic conditions as part of their process of developing public support.


2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iain Osgood

This article documents systematic deviations from standard models of trade politics, each of which has the effect of undermining sustained efforts at coherent industrial opposition to trade. Industries have internal disagreements about liberalization, support for trade liberalization extends bilaterally across borders in the same industry, and comparative disadvantage industries feature convincing expressions of public support for liberalization. These surprising outcomes are explained by a model of trade politics that emphasizes three factors: firm heterogeneity in export performance, product differentiation, and reciprocal liberalization. The author uses a new data set of industry attitudes about fifteen US trade agreements to show that product differentiation is strongly correlated with these outcomes, even conditional on plausible alternatives. The author concludes that public position-taking and lobbying on trade politics have been fundamentally altered by the rise of product variety; trade's opponents and indifferents have been overwhelmed by pro-globalization firms breaking out to support trade on their own.


1997 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1143-1143
Author(s):  
Michael L. Perla
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiri Lutchman ◽  
Diane Sivasubramaniam ◽  
Kimberley A. Clow

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document