Assessing the Safety of Central Counterparties

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Endel Paddrik ◽  
Peyton Young
Keyword(s):  
Central Counterparties

Managing Risk in Multi-Asset Class, Multimarket Central Counterparties: The CORE Approach

CFA Digest ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc L. Ross
Keyword(s):  
The Core ◽  
Central Counterparties ◽  
Asset Class ◽  
Managing Risk

Limiting taxpayer “puts”: an example from central counterparties

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manmohan Singh
Keyword(s):  
Central Counterparties

Central counterparties and systemic stability

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2/3) ◽  
pp. 121-129
Author(s):  
Marc Bayle de Jesse
Keyword(s):  
Central Counterparties

Nondefault loss allocation at central counterparties

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-44
Author(s):  
Rebecca Lewis ◽  
John McPartland
Keyword(s):  
Loss Allocation ◽  
Central Counterparties

Managing Market Liquidity Risk in Central Counterparties

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelos Benos ◽  
Michael Wood ◽  
Pedro Gurrola-Perez
Keyword(s):  
Liquidity Risk ◽  
Market Liquidity ◽  
Central Counterparties

The Politics of Regime Complexity in International Derivatives Regulation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Quaglia
Keyword(s):  
Financial Regulation ◽  
International Political Economy ◽  
Standard Setting ◽  
Capital Requirements ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Financial Industry ◽  
International Standard ◽  
Central Counterparties ◽  
Venue Shopping ◽  
Private Actors

This book examines the post-crisis international derivatives regulation by bringing together the international relations literature on regime complexity and the international political economy literature on financial regulation. Specifically, it addresses three interconnected questions. What factors drove international standard-setting on derivatives post-crisis? Why did international regime complexity emerge? How was it managed and with what outcomes? Theoretically, this research innovatively combines a state-centric, a transgovernmental and a business-led explanations. Empirically, it examines all the main sets of standards (or elemental regimes) concerning derivatives, namely: trading, clearing, and reporting derivatives; resilience, recovery, and resolution of central counterparties; bank capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties and derivatives; margins for derivatives non-centrally cleared. Regime complexity in derivatives ensued from the multi-dimensionality and the interlinkages of the problems to tackle, especially because it was a new policy area without a focal international standard-setter. Overall, the international cooperation that took place in order to promote regulatory precision, stringency, and consistency in the regime complex on derivatives was remarkable, especially considering the large number of policy actors involved (states, private actors, regulators). The main jurisdictions played an important role in managing regime complexity, but their effectiveness was constrained by limited domestic coordination. Networks of regulators facilitated international standard-setting and contributed to managing regime complexity through formal and informal tools. The financial industry, at times, lobbied in favour of less precise and stringent rules, engaging in international ‘venue shopping’; other times, it promoted regulatory harmonization and consistency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document