scholarly journals Humeral shaft fracture: a randomized controlled trial of nonoperative versus operative management (plate fixation)

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 141-147
Author(s):  
Seyed Mahdi Hosseini Khameneh ◽  
Mohammadreza Abbasian ◽  
Hashem Abrishamkarzadeh ◽  
Shahab Bagheri ◽  
Fahimeh Abdollahimajd ◽  
...  
1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 785
Author(s):  
Kwang Won Lee ◽  
Kyou Hyeun Kim ◽  
Ha Yong Kim ◽  
Young Sik Min ◽  
Hwan Jung Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 522-529
Author(s):  
Jamie A. Nicholson ◽  
Nick D. Clement ◽  
Andrew D. Clelland ◽  
Deborah J. MacDonald ◽  
A. Hamish R. W. Simpson ◽  
...  

Aims It is unclear whether acute plate fixation facilitates earlier return of normal shoulder function following a displaced mid-shaft clavicular fracture compared with nonoperative management when union occurs. The primary aim of this study was to establish whether acute plate fixation was associated with a greater return of normal shoulder function when compared with nonoperative management in patients who unite their fractures. The secondary aim was to investigate whether there were identifiable predictors associated with return of normal shoulder function in patients who achieve union with nonoperative management. Methods Patient data from a randomized controlled trial were used to compare acute plate fixation with nonoperative management of united fractures. Return of shoulder function was based on the age- and sex-matched Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores for the cohort. Independent predictors of an early recovery of normal shoulder function were investigated using a separate prospective series of consecutive nonoperative displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures recruited over a two-year period (aged ≥ 16 years). Patient demographics and functional recovery were assessed over the six months post-injury using a standardized protocol. Results Data from the randomized controlled trial consisted of 86 patients who underwent operative fixation compared with 76 patients that united with nonoperative treatment. The recovery of normal shoulder function, as defined by a DASH score within the predicted 95% confidence interval for each respective patient, was similar between each group at six weeks (operative 26.7% vs nonoperative 25.0%, p = 0.800), three months (52.3% vs 44.2%, p = 0.768), and six months post-injury (86.0% vs 90.8%, p = 0.349). The mean DASH score and return to work were also comparable at each timepoint. In the prospective cohort, 86.5% (n = 173/200) achieved union by six months post-injury (follow-up rate 88.5%, n = 200/226). Regression analysis found that no specific patient, injury, or fracture predictor was associated with an early return of function at six or 12 weeks. Conclusion Return of normal shoulder function was comparable between acute plate fixation and nonoperative management when union was achieved. One in two patients will have recovery of normal shoulder function at three months, increasing to nine out of ten patients at six months following injury when union occurs, irrespective of initial treatment. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):522–529.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document