New ways of treatment of fractures of the humeral shaft: does the combination of intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and cerclage improve the healing process?

Introduction The humeral shaft fracture is a rare fracture of the long bones with various treatment options. Dreaded complications such as lesions of the radial nerve or non-unions make the decision for what kind of therapy option more difficult. Biomechanically the upper arm is mostly exposed to rotational forces, which affect intramedullary nail osteosynthesis. Additive cerclage may compensate for these in spiral fractures. The aim of this study is to investigate what effect a combination of intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and limited invasive cerclage has on the rate of healing. In addition, this study addresses the question if complications arise as a result of cerclage. Methods In this retrospective study, 109 patients were evaluated, who, during a period of 6 years, underwent operative treatment of a humerus shaft fracture with a combination of intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and additive cerclage. The primary end point was to establish the rate of healing. A secondary end point was to evaluate complications such as infections and damage to the nerve. This was followed by an examination of patient files and X-ray images and a statistical analysis with SPSS. Results and conclusion The healing process shows a non-union rate of 2.6%, and complications such as secondary radial nerve lesions of 4.6%. The antegrade intramedullary nail osteosynthesis with limited invasive, additive cerclage reduces the risk of non-union and does not lead to an increased risk of iatrogenic damage to the radial nerve. Wound healing was not impaired and there were no infections through the cerclage in our patient cohort.

Level of Sagittal Plane Fit of Plates on the Radial Shaft: A Cadaveric Study Comparing Precontoured and Straight Titanium Plates

Background: During radial shaft fracture fixation, it is important to contour the plate appropriately to restore the radial bow in order to maintain normal forearm mechanics and motion. The aim of this study was to investigate the fit of precontoured radial shaft plates versus surgeon-contoured plates. Methods: Six 10-hole Acumed® precontoured volar and dorsolateral radius plates and twelve 10-hole Synthes straight titanium 3.5 mm LC-DCP plates were drilled with arrays of 1.5 mm diameter holes to permit measurement of the plate distance off bone. Plates were applied to 6 cadaver radii and secured with a screw on each end. Three plate conditions were tested: precontoured plates, precontoured plates with further surgeon contouring, and straight plates with surgeon contouring. Surgeon contouring time for each plate was recorded. Each plate was divided into 3 equal regions, and the average distance gaps for each region and the entire plate were calculated. Results: For the volar side, precontoured plates had a larger total gap compared to that plate with additional surgeon contouring (1.4 mm difference) and the straight surgeon-contoured plates (1.2 mm difference). On the dorsal side, there was no difference in fit between the 3 plate conditions at any location. No differences were found in plate contouring times. Conclusions: The precontoured dorsal plate fit was as good as the surgeon-contoured plates indicating this plate could potentially be used in fracture surgery without further bending. The precontoured volar plate was under-contoured, on average, and would likely require further bending to restore the radial bow.