scholarly journals Chest wall reconstruction with a methyl-methacrylate sandwich after resection of large chest wall tumors: single center experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-95
Author(s):  
essam mohamed ◽  
abdelhady helmy
2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Zohreh Mohammadtaheri ◽  
Atosa Dorudinia ◽  
Abolghasem Daneshvar ◽  
Pegah Akhavan Azar ◽  
Foruzan Mohammadi

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 5093-5100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Scarnecchia ◽  
Valeria Liparulo ◽  
Alessandra Pica ◽  
Giuseppe Guarro ◽  
Carmine Alfano ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Tarık Yağcı ◽  
Ahmet Üçvet ◽  
Ezgi Çimen Güvenç ◽  
Banu Yoldaş ◽  
Soner Gürsoy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4057-4083
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Xiaolong Yan ◽  
Jinbo Zhao ◽  
Chang Chen ◽  
Chun Chen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 284
Author(s):  
IA Nwafor ◽  
OC Okafor ◽  
JC Eze ◽  
N Ezemba

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 829-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reda E Al-Refaie ◽  
Sameh Amer ◽  
Mohammed F Ismail ◽  
Mohammed Al-Shabrawy ◽  
Galal Al-Gamal ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (08) ◽  
pp. 575-586
Author(s):  
Nikhil R. Shah ◽  
Haripriya S. Ayyala ◽  
Bao Ngoc N. Tran ◽  
Paul J. Therattil ◽  
Jonathan D. Keith

Abstract Background Composite defects after chest wall resection may leave patients at risk with lack of protection of vital structures and potentially respiratory compromise secondary to flail segments. Reconstruction of the chest wall with various alloplastic materials is possible and well described. Here, the authors present a novel technique in chest wall reconstruction utilizing a methyl methacrylate (MMA) “sandwich” with biologic mesh. The authors also sought to determine outcomes in chest wall reconstruction with MMA to optimize surgical decision making and minimize patient morbidity. Methods A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library for primary research articles on chest wall reconstruction using MMA. Data related to surgical techniques and patient outcomes were extracted and analyzed. The authors also present their case series and outcomes utilizing a novel technique with biologic mesh. Results Seventy-four articles met inclusion criteria, which included a total of 562 patients. Reconstruction methods included three main variations of the MMA prosthesis and six institution-specific variations. Complications were reported in 13.7% of patients; the most common complications included infection (5.6%), respiratory failure (3.3%), and atelectasis (1.7%). Less commonly reported complications included prosthesis dislocation (1.2%), pneumonia (1.0%), and lung collapse (0.4%). Overall mortality due to respiratory causes was observed in nine patients (1.6%). In our case series, complications included respiratory failure and seroma was reported in one patient, with no complications at long-term follow-up. Conclusion There are a variety of options available for rigid and nonrigid prosthetic repair of the chest wall. We present the first successful reported case series of reconstruction using biologic mesh as a component of the MMA sandwich prosthesis. MMA appears to be a safe and effective choice for rigid reconstruction when used alone or in conjunction with synthetic or biologic mesh.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949901983829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aalap C Shah ◽  
Kazimierz W Komperda ◽  
Arun A Mavanur ◽  
Steven W Thorpe ◽  
Kurt R Weiss ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document