Medical treatment of early pregnancy failure is viable

2008 ◽  
Vol 551 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-5
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonja R. Nansel ◽  
Faith Doyle ◽  
Margaret M. Frederick ◽  
Jun Zhang

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce van den Berg ◽  
Charlotte C. Hamel ◽  
Marcus P. Snijders ◽  
Sjors F. Coppus ◽  
Frank P. Vandenbussche

Abstract Background Early pregnancy failure (EPF) is a common complication of pregnancy. If women do not abort spontaneously, they will undergo medical or surgical treatment in order to remove the products of conception from the uterus. Curettage, although highly effective, is associated with a risk of complications; medical treatment with misoprostol is a safe and less expensive alternative. Unfortunately, after 1 week of expectant management in case of EPF, medical treatment with misoprostol has a complete evacuation rate of approximately 50%. Misoprostol treatment results may be improved by pre-treatment with mifepristone; its effectiveness has already been proven for other indications of pregnancy termination. This study will test the hypothesis that, in EPF, the sequential combination of mifepristone with misoprostol is superior to the use of misoprostol alone in terms of complete evacuation (primary outcome), patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs (secondary outcomes). Methods The trial will be performed multi-centred, prospectively, two-armed, randomised, double-blinded and placebo-controlled. Women with confirmed EPF by ultrasonography (6–14 weeks), managed expectantly for at least 1 week, can be included and randomised to pre-treatment with oral mifepristone (600 mg) or oral placebo (identical in appearance). Randomisation will take place after receiving written consent to participate. In both arms pre-treatment will be followed by oral misoprostol, which will start 36–48 h later consisting of two doses 400 μg (4 hrs apart), repeated after 24 h if no tissue is lost. Four hundred sixty-four women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre. Ultrasonography 2 weeks after treatment will determine short term treatment effect. When the gestational sac is expulsed, expectant management is advised until 6 weeks after treatment when the definitive primary endpoint, complete or incomplete evacuation, will be determined. A sonographic endometrial thickness < 15 mm using only the allocated therapy by randomisation is considered as successful treatment. Secondary outcome measures (patient satisfaction, complications, side effects and costs) will be registered using a case report form, patient diary and validated questionnaires (Short Form 36, EuroQol-VAS, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire). Discussion This trial will answer the question if, in case of EPF, after at least 1 week of expectant management, sequential treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol is more effective than misoprostol alone to achieve complete evacuation of the products of conception. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (d.d. 02-07-2017): NCT03212352. Trialregister.nl (d.d. 03-07-2017): NTR6550. EudraCT number (d.d. 07-08-2017): 2017–002694-19. File number Commisie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (d.d. 07-08-2017): NL 62449.091.17.


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nandaram Seervi ◽  
Nupur Hooja ◽  
Lata Rajoria ◽  
Asha Verma ◽  
Kusum Malviya ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilia Bord ◽  
Michael Gdalevich ◽  
Ravit Nahum ◽  
Simion Meltcer ◽  
Eyal Y. Anteby ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (13) ◽  
pp. 2142-2147
Author(s):  
Alexis C. Gimovsky ◽  
Amelie Pham ◽  
Sindy C. Moreno ◽  
Sara Nicholas ◽  
Amanda Roman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-67
Author(s):  
Nasima Begum ◽  
Shahnaz Akhter ◽  
Luna Laila

Introduction: Misoprostol is increasingly used to treat women who have a failed pregnancy may be due to blighted ovum (anembryonic gestation), incomplete abortion, missed abortion, inevitable abortion in the first trimester. Medical treatment with Misoprostol is an alternative to conventional surgical treatment. Use of Misoprostol is simple, highly acceptable, noninvasive and preferred by women. In addition to surgical risk and patient's preference, medical evacuation reduces the need for hospital stay and the overall management cost. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of Misoprostol for evacuation of uterus in early pregnancy loss and to compare the result with surgical evacuation. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective randomized study conducted on 50 patients at the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Border Guard Hospital, Dhaka during the period from February 2018 to July 2019. Here 25 patients received Misoprostol as medical treatment and 25 patients received surgical treatment. Results: Of the 25 women assigned to receive Misoprostol, 19(76%) had complete expulsion by 24 hours and 22(88%) by 7 days. Complete evacuation after 1st dose was 68% and after 2nd dose 88%. Misoprostol treatment failed in 3(12%) cases and required surgical evacuation. Among the respondents 80% women stated that they would use Misoprostol again if the need arises. Conclusion: Medical treatment with Misoprostol is a cheaper alternative to surgery. Given its success rate near about 88% with mild side effects controllable with additional medication and above all patient’s satisfaction, it should be prioritized over the evacuation curettage in patients who meet the treatment criteria. JAFMC Bangladesh. Vol 16, No 2 (December) 2020: 63-67


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document