A Systematic Review of Amnestic and Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Induced by Anticholinergic, Antihistamine, GABAergic and Opioid Drugs

Drugs & Aging ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 639-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara Tannenbaum ◽  
Amélie Paquette ◽  
Sarah Hilmer ◽  
Jayna Holroyd-Leduc ◽  
Ryan Carnahan
Drugs & Aging ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 639-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara Tannenbaum ◽  
Amélie Paquette ◽  
Sarah Hilmer ◽  
Jayna Holroyd-Leduc ◽  
Ryan Carnahan

Author(s):  
Liselotte De Wit ◽  
Michael Marsiske ◽  
Deirdre O’Shea ◽  
Roy P.C. Kessels ◽  
Andrea M. Kurasz ◽  
...  

Abstract The notion that procedural learning and memory is spared in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has important implications for interventions aiming to build on intact cognitive functions. However, despite these clinical implications, there are mixed findings in the literature about whether or not procedural learning remains intact. This meta-analysis examines the standard mean difference of all published studies regarding procedural learning in AD dementia or amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) compared to cognitively healthy older adults. Additionally, we conducted statistical equivalence analyses. Our systematic review showed that only a limited number of studies (k = 17) have compared procedural learning between individuals with aMCI or AD dementia and healthy controls. Our meta-analysis, which synthesized these studies, demonstrated that while procedural learning performance was not statistically equivalent between individuals with aMCI or AD dementia, and healthy older adults, the difference was clinically and statistically trivial. Although larger studies are needed, the present findings suggest that procedural learning does appear to remain spared in aMCI and AD dementia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document