IBM Open Science Price - SWAP Gate Challenge

A huge collaborative open science model is proposed. Many authors collaborating in a paper leads to a substantial reduction for the Article Processing Charges (APCs) in the Open Access Journals. This can significantly stimulate research within a healthier citizen and open science culture.

Call for co-signing a paper: Increasing collaboration, fostering open science, and sharing the Article Processing Charge (APC)

10.31219/osf.io/62x8h ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Matheus Pereira Lobo

Keyword(s):

Open Science ◽

Article Processing Charge

We argue that sharing one's research with citizens and other scientists is a win-win crowd science strategy.

Publikasi Akademik Sepanjang 2019

10.31219/osf.io/fw3xc ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Adib Rifqi Setiawan

Keyword(s):

Open Science ◽

Research Papers ◽

Science Framework

Berikut ini beberapa publikasi saya pada 2019 ini. Penting atau tidak, saya menganggap bahwa publikasi hanyalah efek samping riset. Di luar publikasi ini, saya juga masih aktif sebagai penulis media daring, seperti Qureta.com, Selasar.com, dan SantriMilenial.net serta mengunggah beberapa artikel preprint melalui layanan Open Science Framework (OSF), EdArxiv.org, dan Research Papers in Economics (RePEc).

Introduction to the special section on Increasing Replicability, Transparency, and Openness in Clinical Psychology

10.31234/osf.io/5zxbd ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Jennifer L Tackett ◽

Josh Miller

Keyword(s):

Empirical Evidence ◽

Data Sharing ◽

Clinical Psychology ◽

Special Section ◽

Psychological Research ◽

Open Science ◽

Clinical Psychologists ◽

Existing Problems

As psychological research comes under increasing fire for the crisis of replicability, attention has turned to methods and practices that facilitate (or hinder) a more replicable and veridical body of empirical evidence. These trends have focused on “open science” initiatives, including an emphasis on replication, transparency, and data sharing. Despite this broader movement in psychology, clinical psychologists and psychiatrists have been largely absent from the broader conversation on documenting the extent of existing problems as well as generating solutions to problematic methods and practices in our area (Tackett et al., 2017). The goal of the current special section was to bring together psychopathology researchers to explore these and related areas as they pertain to the types of research conducted in clinical psychology and allied disciplines.