scholarly journals Visual Impact Assessment of the Energetic Materials Complex Construction Project on Manhattan Project–Era Historic Properties, the TA-06-0037 Concrete Bowl, and the TA-22-0001 Quonset Hut

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Stark
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Energetic Materials ◽  
Construction Project ◽  
Manhattan Project ◽  
Complex Construction ◽  
Visual Impact ◽  
Visual Impact Assessment

VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF COLOUR AND SCALE OF BUILDINGS ON THE RURAL LANDSCAPE

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1537-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Jesus Montero-Parejo ◽  
Lorenzo Garcia-Moruno ◽  
Sergio Lopez-Casares ◽  
Julio Hernandez-Blanco
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Rural Landscape ◽  
Visual Impact ◽  
Visual Impact Assessment

Visual impact assessment of coloured Building-integrated photovoltaics on retrofitted building facades using saliency mapping

Solar Energy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 643-658
Author(s):  
Huixuan Sun ◽  
Chye Kiang Heng ◽  
Thomas Reindl ◽  
Stephen Siu Yu Lau
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Building Integrated Photovoltaics ◽  
Building Facades ◽  
Visual Impact ◽  
Visual Impact Assessment

Visual impact assessment of the Istanbul Land-wall

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1359-1373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hüseyin Ögçe ◽  
Haldun Müderrisoğlu ◽  
Serir Uzun
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Visual Quality ◽  
The Other ◽  
Sample Group ◽  
The Public ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Public Survey ◽  
Visual Impact ◽  
One Way Anova ◽  
Visual Impact Assessment

Visual impact assessment studies are reasonably substantial to understand an environment which has different features. The aim of this study is to evaluate the visual impact of the Istanbul Land-wall and contribute to future design/planning stages. For this purpose, the study area was separated into four different spatial usages which are recreational, transportation, agricultural and neglected places. Twenty-four different photographs were taken and a survey was conducted upon an expert and a public sample group. The public survey included four parameters: well-kept, exciting, safety and beautiful scenery. The expert survey also involved four parameters which were coherence, imageability, stewardship and historicity. One-way ANOVA test was conducted to reveal sample groups’ effect on the preferences. The results showed that the average scores of photographs evaluated by public and experts were 11.07 and 9.80 scores respectively. In the public survey, the photograph, has the lowest scores for all parameters, was Photo-11 (P11). Experts’ result shows particularly that historicity is lower than the others although the area is a historical region. Specifically, neglected places obtained lower scores than the other spatial types. Consequently, the Istanbul Land-wall does not have adequate visual quality regarding the selected parameters.

Teaching visual impact assessment at a master level

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 703-714
Author(s):  
Cristina Manchado ◽  
Valentin Gomez-Jauregui ◽  
Gorka Manero ◽  
César Carrasco ◽  
César Otero
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Master Level ◽  
Visual Impact ◽  
Visual Impact Assessment

Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landscape Institute ◽  
I.E.M.A.
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Visual Impact ◽  
Visual Impact Assessment

Visual impact assessment method for wind parks: A case study in Crete

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 110-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kokologos ◽  
I. Tsitoura ◽  
V. Kouloumpis ◽  
T. Tsoutsos
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Impact Assessment Method ◽  
Visual Impact ◽  
Visual Impact Assessment

On the applicability of the visual impact assessment OAI SPP tool to photovoltaic plants

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 845-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Chiabrando ◽  
Enrico Fabrizio ◽  
Gabriele Garnero
Keyword(s):  
Impact Assessment ◽  
Visual Impact ◽  
Photovoltaic Plants ◽  
Visual Impact Assessment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document