Kentucky Pioneer Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Demonstration Project Final Environmental Impact Statement

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
N
Author(s):  
C. J. Bower ◽  
S. H. Goldthorpe ◽  
G. Fynes

The Global Warming R&D Programme at the Coal Research Establishment is evaluating options for removing CO2 from coal-fired power plant. The aim is to identify coal-based technologies with minimal emissions of CO2 as contingency planning in case the most pessimistic fears of warming are realised. Two promising options based on Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle have been identified, so far. One incorporates a conventional CO shift conversion step and a physical solvent scrubbing process to remove 90% of the CO2 and 99% of the H2S. The second approach is conceptual, using CO shift but also a membrane gas separator. The gas turbine would be fired with hydrogen in both cases. A discussion of the environmental impact of these schemes suggests that they would be very much cleaner than current technology using Pulverised Fuel combustion with Flue Gas Desulphurisation. CO2 disposal options and needs for future work are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
Vontas Alfenny Nahan ◽  
Audrius Bagdanavicius ◽  
Andrew McMullan

In this study a new multi-generation system which generates power (electricity), thermal energy (heating and cooling) and ash for agricultural needs has been developed and analysed. The system consists of a Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (BIGCC) and an absorption chiller system. The system generates about 3.4 MW electricity, 4.9 MW of heat, 88 kW of cooling and 90 kg/h of ash. The multi-generation system has been modelled using Cycle Tempo and EES. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of this system had been conducted and exergy costs have been calculated. The exergoeconomic study shows that gasifier, combustor, and Heat Recovery Steam Generator are the main components where the total cost rates are the highest. Exergoeconomic variables such as relative cost difference (r) and exergoeconomic factor (f) have also been calculated. Exergoeconomic factor of evaporator, combustor and condenser are 1.3%, 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively, which is considered very low, indicates that the capital cost rates are much lower than the exergy destruction cost rates. It implies that the improvement of these components could be achieved by increasing the capital investment. The exergy cost of electricity produced in the gas turbine and steam turbine is 0.1050 £/kWh and 0.1627 £/kWh, respectively. The cost of ash is 0.0031 £/kg. In some Asian countries, such as Indonesia, ash could be used as fertilizer for agriculture. Heat exergy cost is 0.0619 £/kWh for gasifier and 0.3972 £/kWh for condenser in the BIGCC system. In the AC system, the exergy cost of the heat in the condenser and absorber is about 0.2956 £/kWh and 0.5636 £/kWh, respectively. The exergy cost of cooling in the AC system is 0.4706 £/kWh. This study shows that exergoeconomic analysis is powerful tool for assessing the costs of products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document