Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias)

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross G. Vennesland ◽  
Robert W. Butler
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 2544-2558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita M. Seston ◽  
Timothy B. Fredricks ◽  
Dustin L. Tazelaar ◽  
Sarah J. Coefield ◽  
Patrick W. Bradley ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Millins ◽  
Janet E. Hill ◽  
Gary Wobeser

2020 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Rosser ◽  
Ethan T. Woodyard ◽  
Meisha N. Mychajlonka ◽  
D. Tommy King ◽  
Matt J. Griffin ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley L. Erlandsen ◽  
William J. Bemrick ◽  
Carol L. Wells ◽  
Dennis E. Feely ◽  
Lloyd Knudson ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
LINDA M. CONNOLLY ◽  
MARK A. COLWELL

Commercial oyster Crassostrea spp. cultivation in intertidal habitats may degrade foraging habitat of waterbirds. Consequently, we compared species abundances, community similarity and diversity of waterbirds using longline oyster culture beds and adjacent control plots on tidal flats of Humboldt Bay, California. Abundances of most species differed significantly between treatments, with seven of 13 shorebirds Charadriiformes and three of four wading birds Ciconiiformes more abundant on longline plots. By contrast, Black-bellied Plover Pluvialis squatarola were more abundant on control plots. Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa, Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus and Dunlin Calidris alpina showed mixed results depending on location and Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias were more abundant only on one control plot. Community composition was similar on longline and control plots, although diversity (H′) was greater on longline plots. Varying species' responses to longline techniques may have been associated with interspecific differences in diet and foraging behaviour, and the impacts of longlines and oyster-harvesting on prey distribution. Overall, longlines did not negatively affect the foraging behaviour of most species, but the underlying causes for increased bird use may lead to impacts on other trophic levels and over a longer temporal scale.


1992 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darin C. Bennett ◽  
Victoria A. Bowes ◽  
Maryanne R. Hughes ◽  
Leslie E. Hart

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Zickefoose ◽  
William E. Davis

Waterbirds ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elly C. Knight ◽  
Ross G. Vennesland ◽  
Neville N. Winchester

2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross G. Vennesland

The nesting behaviour of the Great Blue Heron ( Ardea herodias L., 1758) was studied in western Canada in 1998 and 1999 to (i) investigate how individual parents assess risk when repeatedly exposed to a disturbance stimulus (an investigator) and (ii) experimentally test in the field whether any variation in their nest defense behaviour was due to experience with the disturbance stimuli or the stage of the nesting period. Heron response declined through the nesting period and the level of response varied among colonies, suggesting different perceptions of risk among groups of herons in the study. It was experimentally shown that variation in the response of herons through one nesting period was due to both behavioural habituation and the stage of the nesting period. Response was stronger in 1999 than in 1998, indicating that habituation did not hold between nesting periods. In general, habituation in herons may bode well for their potential to persist in areas with light human use. But irrespective of habituation, stimuli early in the nesting period and large or novel events may still cause herons to abandon their nests owing to the effects of the stage of the nesting period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document