Predictive biomarkers for linking disease pathology and drug effect

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (999) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Bernd Mayer ◽  
Andreas Heinzel ◽  
Arno Lukas ◽  
Paul Perco
2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustaf J. Wellhagen ◽  
Bengt Hamrén ◽  
Maria C. Kjellsson ◽  
Magnus Åstrand

Abstract Purpose In this paper we investigated a new method for dose-response analysis of longitudinal data in terms of precision and accuracy using simulations. Methods The new method, called Dose-Response Mixed Models for Repeated Measures (DR-MMRM), combines conventional Mixed Models for Repeated Measures (MMRM) and dose-response modeling. Conventional MMRM can be applied for highly variable repeated measure data and is a way to estimate the drug effect at each visit and dose, however without any assumptions regarding the dose-response shape. Dose-response modeling, on the other hand, utilizes information across dose arms and describes the drug effect as a function of dose. Drug development in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is complicated by many factors, primarily by the slow progression of the disease and lack of predictive biomarkers. Recently, new approaches and biomarkers are being explored to improve efficiency in CKD drug development. Proteinuria, i.e. urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) is increasingly used in dose finding trials in patients with CKD. We use proteinuria to illustrate the benefits of DR-MMRM. Results The DR-MMRM had higher precision than conventional MMRM and less bias than a dose-response model on UACR change from baseline to end-of-study (DR-EOS). Conclusions DR-MMRM is a promising method for dose-response analysis.


2001 ◽  
Vol 18 (Suppl. 23) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. W. Schnider ◽  
C. F. Minto
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Alexander Meisel

Until recently, the clinical management of cancer heavily relied on anatomical and histopathological criteria, with ad hoc guidelines directing the therapeutic choices in specific indications. In the last years, the development and therapeutic implementation of novel anticancer therapies significantly improved the clinical outcome of cancer patients. Nonetheless, such cutting-edge approaches revealed the limitation of the one-size-fits-all paradigm. The newly discovered molecular targets can be exploited either as bona fide targets for subsequent drug development, or as tools to precision medicine, in the form of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers. This article provides an overview of some of the most recent advances in precision medicine in oncology, with a focus on novel tissue-agnostic anticancer therapies. The definition and implementation of biomarkers and companion diagnostics in clinical trials and clinical practice are also discussed, as well as the changing landscape in clinical trial design.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Ge ◽  
Yangyang Cui ◽  
Yue Huang ◽  
Mingjie Zheng ◽  
Xiaowei Wu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document