Impact of UV Irradiation and Peracetic Acid-UV Combined Treatment on MS2 Bacteriophage Virus and Murine Norovirus in Secondary Wastewater Effluent

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (9) ◽  
pp. 3090-3094
Author(s):  
Kellogg J Schwab ◽  
Shih-Chi Weng ◽  
Nate Dunkin ◽  
James McQuarrie ◽  
Joseph Jacangelo
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (9) ◽  
pp. 3095-3102
Author(s):  
Joseph G Jacangelo ◽  
Nathan Dunkin ◽  
Shih-Chi Weng ◽  
James McQuarrie ◽  
Kati Bell ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 2972-2981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Dunkin ◽  
ShihChi Weng ◽  
Kellogg J. Schwab ◽  
James McQuarrie ◽  
Kati Bell ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 35 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Rajala-Mustonen ◽  
P. S. Toivola ◽  
H. Heinonen-Tanski

This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of peracetic acid (PAA) on the inactivation of bacteriophages in wastewater. The possibility of utilising a shorter contact time by combining the treatment by PAA and UV irradiation was also investigated. The phages added in wastewater were exposed to UV irradiation and different concentrations of PAA. The treatment was followed by 15min with PAA and 60min with UV. In the combined treatment, PAA was first added to the wastewater and samples taken after 5 and 10min. Then UV irradiation was applied and samples taken after 1 and 2.5min. The inactivation of the DNA- and RNA-phages by UV irradiation alone for 2.5min was more than 5 log10 and more than 3 log10 units respectively. Peracetic acid inactivated the DNA-phage more than 6 log10 units and RNA-phage about 4 log10 units in 1h contact time. The same inactivation was achieved in 12.5min by PAA and UV together as by PAA alone in 1h. The turbidity of the water decreased the inactivation to some degree. The DNA-phage was clearly more sensitive to both UV irradiation and PAA than the RNA-phage.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (6) ◽  
pp. 76-89
Author(s):  
Achal Garg ◽  
Vasudevan Namboodiri ◽  
Bruce Smith ◽  
Abdulaziz Al-Anazi ◽  
Brindha Murugesan ◽  
...  

LWT ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 109608
Author(s):  
Chae-Hun Lee ◽  
Ji-Hoon Kang ◽  
Hyuk-Je Woo ◽  
Kyung Bin Song

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (20) ◽  
pp. 11918-11927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Dunkin ◽  
ShihChi Weng ◽  
Caroline G. Coulter ◽  
Joseph G. Jacangelo ◽  
Kellogg J. Schwab

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Stephan ◽  
H Dichtelmüller ◽  
A M Prince ◽  
L Gürtler ◽  
F Deinhardt

A combined treatment of plasma andplasma derivatives by β-Propiolactone (β-PL) /UV-irradiation is inuse at Biotest for the preparation ofthe virus safe serum preserve Bisekd® and coagulation factor concentrates.The efficacy of this sterilization procedure has been demonstrated for HAV(> 8.2 log10), HBV ( 7.0 log10) and HNANB (> 4.5 log10). As HIV has become a major problem tne inactivation of HIV by β-PL/UV in human plasma was tested. Pooled human plasma was spiked with 104.2 infectious units per ml of the Gallo strain of HIV/ HTLV-III and sterilized with 0.25 % β-PL, 60 min at pH 7.2 and subsequently UV-irradiated (4 × 20 W). After treatment with β-PL alone orβ-PL/UV no infectious HIV was detectable by reverse transcriptase assay in inoculated H-9 cultures after 14 days of cultivation (> 4.2 log10 inactivation). When the virucidal efficacy of ft-PL and UV was tested separately, β-PL inactivated > 3.5 log10, UV-irradiation another 2.5 log10 of HIV, as demonstrated by immunofluorescence tests in H-9 cultures 27 daysafter inoculation.When cryoprecipitate/F VUI-concentrate was sterilized by ft-PL and UV, > 4.5 log10 of HIV were inactivated by UV and > 3.5 log10 by α-PL. The results indicate, that the combined treatment by β-PL/UV inactivates all potentialtiters of HIV, which can be expected inscreened and pooled human plasma orcryoprecipitate, used for the preparation of virus safe plasma derivatives.


2014 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.L. Buhr ◽  
A.A. Young ◽  
C.A. Johnson ◽  
Z.A. Minter ◽  
C.M. Wells

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document