scholarly journals Dynamic hip screw with locked plate VRS Proximal Femoral Nail for the management of intertrochanteric fracture: A comparative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2c) ◽  
pp. 173-180
Author(s):  
Dr. SPS Gill ◽  
Dr. Ankit Mittal ◽  
Dr. Manish Raj ◽  
Dr. Pulkesh Singh ◽  
Dr. Sunil Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Locked Plate ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Hip Screw

scholarly journals Comparative study of functional outcome of the intertrochanteric fracture of femur managed by Dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Shakeel A. Qidwai ◽  
Robin Singh ◽  
Amit Nandan Mishra ◽  
Vikas Trivedi ◽  
Afroz Ahmed Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Hip Screw

scholarly journals Comparative study between dynamic hip screw & proximal femoral nail in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3i) ◽  
pp. 628-637
Author(s):  
Dr. Ajit swamy ◽  
Dr. Amit Swamy ◽  
Dr. Aniruddha kshirsagar ◽  
Dr. Kartikeya sharma
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Hip Screw

scholarly journals A study to assess proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw device in surgical management of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
E. S. Radhe Shyam ◽  
K. Ashwin
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Technical Failure ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Hip Screw

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The incidence of inter trochanteric fracture is expected to have doubled by 2040. Inter trochanteric fractures account for about 45% to 50% of all hip fractures in the elderly populationand out of these, near about 50% to 60% are classified as unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure. This study as performed<strong> </strong>to assess functional outcome with dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in intertrochanteric fracture management.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> It was prospective observational study done for a period of 1year from January 2016-January 2017 among patients who attended OPD or emergency department with intertrochanteric fracture. Two different implants were used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Excellent results in functional outcome was more in case of PFN (66.6%) compared to DHS (50%). The type of trauma in DHS group was road traffic accident in 38.8%, domestic fall in 50% and others such as assault was in 11.1% while in PFN group intertrochanteric fracture was seen in 61.1% due to domestic fall.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The functional outcome was more better with proximal femoral nail (PFN) compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS). Therefore, proximal femoral nail (PFN) should be preferred for management of intertrochanteric fractures.</p>

Comparison of soft-tissue serum markers in stable intertrochanteric fracture: Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail—A preliminary study

Injury ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Young Hong ◽  
Seung-Woo Suh ◽  
Jung-Ho Park ◽  
Young-Soo Shin ◽  
Jung-Ro Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
Preliminary Study

scholarly journals A prospective comparative study in the clinical outcome of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture femur with proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 986
Author(s):  
Pradyumna R. Gowda ◽  
Manjunath J.
Keyword(s):  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Subtrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Fracture Group ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Hip Screw

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-AU">Trochanteric fractures are the most common fractures encountered accounting for 50% of all hip fractures. Subtrochanteric femur fractures have high rate of complications associated with their management. 10%–34% of all hip fractures occur in the subtrochanteric region</span><span lang="EN-IN">.</span>The study was <span lang="EN-AU">to compare the </span><span lang="EN-IN">clinical outcome of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture femur with proximal femoral nail (PFN) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS).</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">A prospective study of 50 patients with intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture among which 30 were treated with Proximal Femoral Nail and 20 with Dynamic Hip Screw at SSIMS-SPARSH Davangere, Karnataka, India between June 2015 to November 2016.</span><span lang="EN-AU"> At final follow up results were assessed with Modified Harris Hip score</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Among the PFN Intertrochanteric fracture group, 9 patients showed excellent outcome, 6 patients showed good outcome and 2 patients showed fair outcome and 1 patient showed poor outcome. Among the PFN subtrochanteric fracture group, 7 patients showed excellent outcome, 3 patients showed good outcome and 1 patients showed fair outcome and 1 patient showed poor outcome. Among the DHS intertrochanteric fracture group, 3 patients showed excellent outcome, 3 patients showed good outcome and 2 patients showed fair outcome and 2 patient showed poor outcome. Among the DHS subtrochanteric fracture group, 1 patients showed excellent outcome, 2 patients showed good outcome and 3 patients showed fair outcome and 4 patient showed poor outcome</span><span lang="EN-IN">. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Fractures of the trochanteric region of the femur need a proper selection of implant based on fracture pattern. DHS has excellent results when used on stable fractures. For unstable fractures, PFN is the implant of choice. In case of subtrochanteric fractures PFN has better results in both stable and unstable fractures compared to DHS with less failure rates and restoring better hip biomechanics</span><span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document